Dismissed

Moyya Raghavendernath v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC9 Nov 2023CRLP/6675/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of Criminal Petition No.6675 of 2023 filing a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C for quashing criminal proceedings. It held the petition infructuous because the petitioner had already filed CrI.P.No.12897 of 2018 for the same relief.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition No.6675 of 2023 dismissed as infructuous; pending miscellaneous applications dismissed.

Moyya Raghavendernath Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³²⁵¹ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH^COURT FOR^{THE STATEOF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE NINTH^{DAYOF NOVEMBER} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY THREE}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER}

¶6

CRIMINAL PETI^{TION NO:6675 0F 2023}

¶7

Between:

¶8

'y.?y"?sT[1'Fil,1:lr'!ai1.?;,]ity""Jl,,ffi;1333$x'"13"^i;?:f Jubilee Hills,^HYderabad.

¶9

Movva Sumalatha,^{Wo. M. Raghavendernath'aged about 40 yers'Occ} ' ii;,l#-'If":'iil".'abt'rlb. aalwofiens co-op Housiig societv' Road No' 7-A' Jubilee Hills,^HYderabad

¶10

3.MowaArunaBai,Wo.M.Ravindernath,..agedabout66-years,R/o." ii;,]#*ir;,^'iv.lFibt i'io]ea, w6r"nico-op'HoIsing societv, Road No 7-A' Jubilee Hills, HYderabad.

¶11

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶12

AND

¶13

1 The State of^{Telangana,Repby its Public Prosecutor,HighCourt of} Telangana at^HYderabad.

¶14

2 Sri. M. Rama Raiu, S/o.^{M. SuryanarayanaRaju,Joint Secretary of Sattva} Enclave Welfare-Association^{age not known}

¶15

...RESPONDENTS

¶16

Petition under Section^{482 ot Cr} 'P^{C praying that in the circumstances} statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighCourtmay.be oleasedtoQuashtheproceedingsinC.C.No33of20lBonthefileoftheXll lJJiti"""icni"rMetropolitan^{Ma-gistrate, Hyderabadin so far as petitionersare} concerned.

¶17

t.A. NO: 1 OF²⁰²³

¶18

Petition under^{Section482 of Cr'P'C praying that in th.e circumstances} statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofCriminalPetition,theHighcounmayoe pi"r."i t" gri"t stay of^{all frrtn"r ptoceedings in C C No 38 of 2018 on the file of} itrl if f AJOitionat^{Cfriet Metropolitan Magistrite,Hyderabad in so far as petitioners} pending dispose of the^{above criminalpetition'} "ie "on""rn"a

¶19

This Petition coming on for hearing,^{upon perusing the Memorandumof} Grounds of Criminal^Petition and^{uponhearingthe arguments of Sri CB} sIDDARTH, Advocate^{for the Petitioner and the PublicProsecutoron behalf of the} Respondent No.1 and of Sri M^{VIVEKANANDAREDDY, Advocatefor the} Respondent No.2.

¶20

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶21

----7

¶22

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER

¶23

CRIMINAL PETITION No.6675 OF 2023

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has

¶26

lried CrI.P.No .12897 of 2018 earlier for the same relief

¶27

Recording the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner,

¶28

this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently,

¶29

miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand dismissed,

¶30

SD/- B CHANDRA^PRAKASH, ,/ ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR.

\ 1s"

..r"

//TRUE coPY/'

oFFlcER

'ECTloN

To.'-'1. Th" Xll Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad . i. in" Si"tion^{House otrler,ccs, oo potice Station' Hyderabad} 3. Two ccs^{to the prnfii'pio"L"utor, Highcourtfor the stateof Telangana at} Hyderabad [OUTI CC to SRt.^{StOOnnTH C B Advocate tOfUCl}

¶37

- Oi " ;. o;; cc^{to sRt.tvt vtvirnrunuDA REDDY' Advocate[oPUC]}

¶38

Two CD^CoPies

ADK *2-

HIGH COURT

DATED:0911112023

ORDER

'+e urAt€
(
vi: li
C)
d 15 rEt 2[23
{.J
.a-
* DlsF Al

¶44

GRLP.No.6675 of²⁰²³

¶45

DISMISSING^{THE CRLP AS INFRUCTUOUS}

¶46

Moyya Raghavendernath v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Moyya Raghavendernath v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Rama Krishna Vs State of Telangana

Mohammed Mazhar Ullah Vs The State of Telangana

Thopoji Laxmi Vs The State of Telangana

Kongara Divya Vs State of Telangana

Chamakuri Dhanalaxmi Vs The State of Telangana

Badruddin Dhanani Vs the State of Telangana