Dismissed

Mr.v.L.Ahuja , New Delhi and Three Others v. Public Prosecutor, Hyd and Another

Telangana HC17 Nov 2023CRLP/8993/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of two criminal petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing criminal proceedings. The petitions were dismissed for default of non-prosecution as the petitioners failed to appear on multiple dates, including the dismissal listing.

What did the court decide?

CRIMINAL PETITIONS ARE DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT OF NON PRESENTION. Liberty granted to work out other legal remedies.

Mr.v.L.Ahuja , New Delhi and Three Others Vs… — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NOS: 8993 AND 9000 OF 2015

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8993 OF 201s

¶7

Between:

¶8

MR.V.L. Ahuja, Director of M/s Kare Teleserves lndia^(P) Ltd., Rep. by its Director Occ Business, O/o^',l8, Pusa Road, Karol bagh,^{New Delhi - 1 10005.}

¶9

M/s Kare Teleserves lndia (P) Ltd., Rep- by its Director, Sri V.L.AHUJA, S/o Mangaldas,Occ Business, O/o 18, Pusa Road,^{Karol bagh, New Delhi - 110005.}

¶10

Mr.Aiun Kumar Singh, Director of M/s Kare Teleserves lndia^{(, (P) Ltd.,} S/o^late Chander Bhushan Singh, Occ Business, 0/0^{18, Pusa Road, Karol bagh, New Delhi -} 1 10005.

¶11

M/s Kare Teleservies lndia (P) Ltd-, Rep. by its Director, Mr.Arun Kumar Singh^S/o late Chander Bhushan Singh, age about 52^years, Occ Business, 0/o^{18, Pusa} Road' Karol bagh' New Delhi - 110005

¶12

...pETrroNERS/Accu'EDS No. 10 to 13

¶13

AND

¶14

The State of A.P., Rep. by Public Prosecutor,^{High Court of} A.P.,^Hyderabad.

¶15

Ch. Gowri Shankar, S/o. Ch. Bhaskar Rao, Occ^{Business (Special Class Contractor)} Plot.No. 820, Bhagathsingh Nagar, Beside Vasanthnagar,^{Kukatpally, Hyderabad-} 50085

¶16

...RES'.NDENTS/..M'LA.NANTS

¶17

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^{prayingthat in thecircumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,^{the HighCourt may} be pleased to call for the recordi and^quash the^{proceedingsagainstthe} petitioners in CC.No.205 on the file of lV Special Magistrate, Kukatpally at Miyapur, Cyberabad, Rangareddy District,

¶18

l.A NO: 1 OF 2015(C RLPMP. NO: 9031 OF²⁰¹⁵⁾

¶19

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the^High Court^{may be} pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the petitioners in CC.No.205 of 2012, on the file of lV Special Magistrate,^{Kukatpallyat Miyapur,} Cyberabd, Rangareddy District,^pending disposal of^{quashpetition.}

¶20

CRIMINAL PETITION^{NO: 9000} OF²⁰¹⁵

¶21

Between:

¶22

1 MR.V.L. hhula, Director of M/s Kare^{Teleserveslndia- (P) Ltd} '^Rep ^by-its Director Occ Business, O/o¹ 8,^{Pusa Road, Karol bagh,New Delhi - 1 10005.}

¶23

2 M/s Kare Teleserves lndia^(P) Ltd.,^{Rep.by its Director,Sri V.L AHUJA, S/o} Mangaldas,Occ Business, Oio 18, Pusa^{Road,Karol bagh, NewDelhi-} 110005.

¶24

3 Mr.Arun Kumar Singh, Director of M/s^{KareTeleserv-es lndia(' (P-) Ltd-, S/o} late Chander Bhush-an Singh, Occ^{Business,0/0 18, Pusa Road,Karol bagh'} New Delhi -1 10005.

¶25

4 M/s Kare Teleservies lndia^(P) Ltd., Rep. by^{its Director, Mr-ArunKumar} Sinqh S/o late Chander Bhushdn Singh,^{age about 52 years' Occ Business,} 0/o18, Pusa Road, Karol bagh, New - ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSEDS^{Delhi - 110005.No. 10 to'13}

¶26

AND

¶27

1 The State of A.P., Rep. by Public Prosecutor,^{High Court} '^{at Hyderabad}

¶28

2 Ch- Gowri Shankar, S/o. Cn. Bhaskar^{Rao, Occ Business (Special Class} Contractor) Plot.No. 820, Bhagathsingh^{Nagar, Beside Vasanthnagar,} Kukatpally' Hyderabad-5008t'

¶29

...*aspoNDENTS/coMpLATNANTS

¶30

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that^{in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of^{Criminal Petition, the High Court may} be pleased to call for the records and^{quashthe proceedingsagainst the} petitioners in CC.No.202 of 2O12, on the file of lV Special Magistrate, Kukatpaily at Miyapur, Cyberabd, Rangareddy District.

¶31

l.A. NO:1O 201s(CRLPMP. NO: 9038 OF 2015)

¶32

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^{prayingthat in thecircumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of^{Criminal Petition,the High Court may be} pleased to stay all further proceedings including the appearance of the^petitioners in CC.No.202 of 2012, on the file of lV Special^{Magistrate, Kukatpailyat Miyapur,} Cyberabd, Rangareddy District,^pending disposal^{of quash petition.}

¶33

There Petitions coming on for hearing,upon^{perusingthe Memorandum of} Grounds of Both Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments^{of Sri K V L} NARASIMHA RAO, Advocate for the Petitioner and^{the Sri VizarathAli, Asst.} Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent^{No.1 and} of^{Sri Nadella} Venkateswara Rao, Advocate for the Respondent^No.2.

¶34

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶35

.THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION^{Nos.8993and 9OOO OF 2015}

¶36

coM MONORDER:

¶37

These Criminal Petitions^{are filed by} the petitioners/ accused No.10 to^{13 under Section 482 of Cr.P'C.} seeking to^quash the^{proceedingsagainstthe petitionersin} C.C.No.205 of 2Ol2^{and C.C.No.2O2 of 2012, on the file of IV} Special Magistrate, Kukatpally at^{Miyapur,Cyberabad,Ranga} Reddy District.

¶38

There is no representation^{either side. A perusalof record} shows that there is no^{representationon behalf of the petitioner} on 3.11.2023 and^{10.1L2O23.Eventoday also there is no} representation on behalf^{of the petitioner inspite of listing the} matter under the caption,^{"for dismissal"} '^{This shows that the} petitioner is not evincing^{any interest to prosecute the case.}

¶39

Heard Mr. Vizarath Ali,^{learnedAssistant Public Prosecutor} is present and^{requestedto dismissthe criminal petition.}

¶40

Hence, these Criminal^{Petitions are dismissedfor default of} non-prosecution.^{However,liberty is grantedto the petitionersto} work out remedies as^{available underlaw.}

¶41

Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶42

SD/. B. SARASWATHI ASsrsrANr RE$STRAR

//TRUE COPY//

sEcroN 9(1r".*

To,

The lV Special Magistrate, Kukatpaily at [Iiyapur, Cyberabd, Rangareddy District,

¶47

The Station House Officer, K.P.H.B. Police Station, R. R. District.

¶48

One CC to Sri KVL Narasimha Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

¶49

4- Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana^(OUT)

¶50

Two CD Copies

¶51

BJLB $"-

HIGH COURT

EW, J

DAfED:1711112023

COMMON ORDER

I ,1r€ €TAIIE
1 B J[l'i 2[24
oo:l
'/
*
.<br>n l)g.SPl'{C,

¶57

CRLP.NoS.8993 AND 9000 of 2015

¶58

CRIMINAL PETITION ARE DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT OFR NON PRESENTION

¶59

Mr.v.L.Ahuja , New Delhi and Three Others v. Public Prosecutor, Hyd and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr.v.L.Ahuja , New Delhi and Three Others v. Public Prosecutor, Hyd and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V. Kiran Kumar, R.R.Dist. Vs P.P., Hyd and Ano

V.Kiran Kumar Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

V. Kiran Kumar, R.R.Dist. Vs P.P., Hyd and Ano

Lakamalla Nagaiah, Nalgonda Dt and 4 Otrs., Vs State of Telangana, Rep Pp and Anr.

Koppula Ajay Kumar Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another

Balvanth Reddy Vs the State of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp and Another