V. Kiran Kumar, R.R.Dist. v. P.P., Hyd and Ano
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court, via a common order, closed nine criminal petitions filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. by the same petitioner to quash or stay proceedings in cheque bounce cases. The petitions were closed primarily due to a lack of instructions from the petitioner's counsel, who was absent, and opponent counsel, despite earlier interim stay orders.
What did the court decide?
All criminal petitions are closed due to lack of instructions on either side; the petitioner is at liberty to workout available remedies under law.
What the court decided
tN THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OFNOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEE.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION Nos:11301 1 1302.'l 1303 1 1304.11305. 11307 11313. 11314 and 11315 ot 2015
Crl . Petition No. 1'1301 of 2015:
Between:
V. Kiran Kumar, S/o. Muralaiah Occ:Business R/o.Plot No.'173, Venkateshwara Colony QuthbullapurlrrlunicipalCircleand Mandal GHMC, Ranga Reddy District.
...PETITIONER/ ComPlainant
AND
- The State of Telangana , Throughits Public Prosecutor.High Courtof Judicature at Hyderabad for the State ofTelangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal petitions seeking quashing or stay of proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. in cheque bounce cases should be allowed or closed.
Whether the High Court can close criminal petitions due to lack of instructions on either side.
What reliefs are available to the petitioner after these petitions are closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V. Kiran Kumar
- respondent
The State of Telangana
- respondent
Aleyamma Sebastian
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLP/11313/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court