This judgment dismissed a criminal petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C to quash proceedings under Section 420 IPC. The court held the subject matter did not survive, tracking the case as infructuous.
The criminal petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32se I
_1 rl'f
I
I I I
HIGI{ COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA I
FR|DAY,THE SEVENTEENTHDAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEE.V.VENUGOPAL
t,l CRIMINAL PETITION NO:15149 OF 2014
Between:
:d a9 zl] uramatla lcovindu, r,S/o. ;rVenkaiah,'occ,, Police r Constable, Rl/o. .r. d .ir Parreddyoudem village, Garideially Mandal,Nalgonda District.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
..RESPoNDENT/coMPLAINANTS it
Petition unler Section 482 ofCr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Membrandum of Groundsof Criminal Petitiofi, The HighCourt may be oleased to oua'sh the .C.No.335/2012on the file of JFCM Huzurnagarl/C At Adm Court,: Miryalbuda, NalgondaDistrict for the offence Uls.42O IPCagainst the etitioners herein.
I I I
fr
E,6'--.:*rr:..,.E:.1J.I;-'...r4.
!
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLPMP. NO: 16081 oF 20141
Petition under Section 492 0f cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, lne Hlgtr court may be. . pleased tol stay all proceedings including app.ara,ic. of th; petitioners/Accused No. 1 to 5 herein in c.c.No.33s/2o12 on the file of JFCM -Huzurnagarl/c AtlAdm court,Miryarguda, Nargonda Districtand pass such other it order," or orders fas this ,Hon,ble I Court jmay deem fit and proper in the : \ctrcumstances of the case. . I I ; i: r I i . This'Petitioh coming on for hearing,j upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criilinalpetition r and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V RAGHUNATH ,Advocate for the petitioner and sri. vizaratg Ali Asst public Prosecutor (TG/AB) on behalf of the Respondent No..l ,l I I i
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
::-!-E=i.F:+-
7
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE E. V. VENUGOPAL
tu
CRIMINAL PETITIONNo.15149oF 2014
ORDER:
This criminalpetitionis hled by petitioners / accusedNo' 1 to 5 toquash theC'C.No.335of 2Ol2 on the Iile of JFCM' HuzurnagarI/C at ADMCourt, Miryalguda' Nalgonda District for the offenceunder sectio n42O of IPC against the petitioners herein
l-
Petitions, Pendingif anY, shallstand cl
SD/. T.VUAY KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
/fTRUECOPY// SECTIONOFFICER
To't. Th" JFCM Huzurnagar c The SHOHuzurnagarr f,Jfl-tti{1il{ifl f,fii::;;';"'""" i. fl:83i1"".fii"'Defi
5.Two CD Gopies'
::la&^.=lu
1
I I 1f
HIGH COURT
T
i
I
DATED:17l 1',1t2023
ttt
I
1
tttI
II
I
J
I
,t (
ORDER II
1
t
GRLP.No.15149 ot 2014 ,t I i iit.; *,f ir ,, :l I tI
DrsMtssEDlAS TNFRUCTUOUS .!, d!
.,
tt
i+ t L
i
.,t!,{
\ J.
1tI
L
S1AT E Ox-
'(
./:
(
liA I
f
e, tt lil-
o &,
-t Dril.
I
I
I
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition for quashing proceedings under Section 420 IPC is maintainable or infructuous.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Lakamalla Nagaiah and others
State Of Telangana, Rep PP
E. V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
