V. Kiran Kumar, R.R.Dist. v. P.P., Hyd and Ano
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court closed multiple Criminal Petitions filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash orders in cheque bounce cases due to lack of instructions from both the petitioner and the accused/respondents. No substantive decision on the merits of the cheque allegations was reached.
What did the court decide?
All filed Criminal Petitions are closed due to lack of instructions. Petitioner is at liberty to workout other remedies.
What the court decided
tN THE HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OFNOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEE.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL PETITION Nos:11301 1 1302.'l 1303 1 1304.11305. 11307 11313. 11314 and 11315 ot 2015
Crl . Petition No. 1'1301 of 2015:
Between:
V. Kiran Kumar, S/o. Muralaiah Occ:Business R/o.Plot No.'173, Venkateshwara Colony QuthbullapurlrrlunicipalCircleand Mandal GHMC, Ranga Reddy District.
...PETITIONER/ ComPlainant
AND
- The State of Telangana , Throughits Public Prosecutor.High Courtof Judicature at Hyderabad for the State ofTelangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Petitions should be allowed or dismissed given the lack of instructions on either side.
Whether the impugned common order dismissing the complaints can be quashed.
What order should be passed in the light of the前一order dismissing the petitions filed under Section 91 and 311 of Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V. Kiran Kumar
- respondent
The State of Telangana
- respondent
Aleyamma Sebastian
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLP/11302/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court