Dismissed

Sabitha Uppati v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC27 Jun 2023CRLP/10188/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana disposed of Criminal Petitions filed under Sections 482 and 492 of Cr.P.C. seeking quashing and stay of proceedings in a case involving charges under Sections 420, 406, 109 IPC and Section 12 of the Maintenance Act. Noting that the court below had taken cognizance, the petition was dismissed as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petitions under Sections 482 and 492 Cr.P.C. dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions closed.

Sabitha Uppati Vs The State of Telangana — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

|³²⁵⁴¹

¶2

IN THE COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10188 0F 2022

¶7

Between:

¶8

sabitha upp3li tt!{g !1te Sanjay uppati, Age 42yearc, occ:centrar Government trmproyee, R/o.5"' Floor portion, H. No.1_2_365/36/5 & 9, Ramakrishna Mith Street, Opp. lndrra Park, Gaganmahat noaO, Otmaiguaa, UfOeraOaa.

¶9

. . . PETTTTONER / ACCUSED No.1

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The State of TelSngana through S H O _p S Chikkadapally, Hyderabad, represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad-.

¶12

..., RESPONDENT

¶13

U Lalitha Prasad, Wo. Late U. prasad Rao, Age. 78 years. Occ:pensioner I!: l[l9gp,otpn^{H No 'r-2-365/36rsano-g, nimiiii;h;;-rilrii'6i.X,} upp. tnotra^park, Gaganmahal Road, Domalguda, Hyderabad,

¶14

. . . RESPONDENT / DEFACTO-COMPLAINANT

¶15

Petition under Section 492 of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminir Fetition, the High court may be pleased to quash the F.t.R No.394 of 2021. of p.S. ChikkaOpaffi, HyAeraUaO, as against the Petitioner/Accused No..l

¶16

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2 o22

¶17

Petition under section 482 of cr.p .c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High cou( may be pleased to stay of ail further. proceedings including ,iru.1 oi in" Petitioner/Accused No.1 in F t.R.No 394 of 2021, oT police staion chikkalpaiiy, Hyderabad. This Petition coming on for hearin g, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition and upon heanng the arguments of Sri K. VENUMADHAV, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri S.Ganesh, Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Resp ondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

HON'BLE SI tT. JUSTICE G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAI/ARTHy

¶20

CRI. lIINIAL PETITION No.lO 188 of 2022

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

]'his^{(l -r:.irra} I)t'titiort rs filed rrnrter St.r rror. 1i..2 of tht_. Cork' of L'r-irrir a l)roceduru', 1973, bv lhe pt'titio.-r - r lrcLtuSc(l Ncl. I , to c Lrrrr;h t te proceedrngs agal )st her il F[]rl^{</sup> ) ll14 ()l 2O21, or th( t lc ol- thc St:rLion Housc (Jflir.t,: , Chir krr<tpal11. Policc Statiorr, I ylerabad, registered Ior thc oilcnce s 1rL, trs table. undcr Section:; 420, 406 and 109 l.l).C. lrrrrl Ser,.ri..r .14 ol' Main(enanc'c irr d <sup>/elfare} o1' Parents lrnd St'r.rior. C)ilir^.ns Act, 2007.

¶23

Lcarrerrl Assistant Irrrblic l)rosccLlt.)r ot ,.,1 lLter) instructions, sr b nitted that the po[ce afLcr core rL.tion ol investigation in t-he subject crime filed chargc slrcr:: ri lonr thc, Colrrt conce rlr(,: ancl rt rvas numbered as C.C No.951,1 Ltl 2022. Thercfore, nctl: ing sunivcs in this Crimini I pe r, r,n for adjud icatio n.

¶24

Recotdirrg^r,1: c aforesaid slbmrssilrr, the CrimrllL. [)etLtior-r is dismisserl ar; irf^'ur:tuous.

¶25

Miscr llane )L s Petitlons, pending if anr . shiL, sr.and

¶26

closed.

¶27

S,I/- P. 3i)W1I SHANKAR T.SSIS TI! NT REGISTRAR (j)

¶28

//TRUE COPY// SiE CTION OFFICER

¶29

To,

¶30

1- The lX Addl^{rl!' e1 l/]etropolitanl\rlagistrate at Hyder'rbaci}

¶31

¶32

The Station House Officer (S H O) potrce Station Chikkadpa y, Hyderabad.

¶33

¶34

One CC to SRt K. VENUIVIADHAV. Advocare [opUC]

¶35

4 Two cc to PUBLIC pRosECUroR, Hrgh court for the State of rerangana at Hyderabad lOUTl

¶36

Two CD copies.

¶37

STB \ +-

HIGH COUR'-

DATED:27101i12023

ORDER

CRLP.No.10188 ol 2022

¶44

, '1.
,,;.<br>'!$rr i:l:
,ll!
-_ ti
.,//'

¶45

CRIMINAL Pl:l"lTlON lS DISMISSED,T rti INFRUCTUOUS

¶46

''.9

Sabitha Uppati v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sabitha Uppati v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kumbarthi Venkateswarulu Vs The State of Telangana

Thungapati Bhaskar Vs The State of Telangana

K. Anjaneyulu Vs The State of Telangana and another

Kadarla Laxman and 2 Others Vs The State of Telangana and another

Kadarla Laxman Vs The State of Telangana

Kadarla Laxman Vs The State of Telangana