Kadarla Laxman v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The counsel admitted the matter had become infructuous, leading to dismissal of the petition.
Petitioners sought quashing of criminal proceedings under Section 482 Cr.P.C. The counsel admitted the matter had become infructuous, leading to dismissal of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
13254 |
IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY SEVENTHDAYOF JUNE TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESMT JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
CRIMINA L PETITION NO:9841 OF 2022
Between:
2-20, Venkatapuiam, V/o. YallareddyMandal, Rajanna Sircilla District. ...PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No'2 to 4
AND
...RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 ofCr.P.C prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Groundsof Criminal Petition, the HighCourtmaybe pleased to quash the criminal Proceedings against the Petitioners/AccusedNos.2 to 4 herein in crime No.42812022 ofPS Kamareddy Town, Kamareddy District,for the alleged offences U/Sec.454,380 lPC.
LA. NO: 1OF 2022
Petition under Section 482 ofCr.P.C prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum ofGroundsof Criminal Petition, the High Court maybe pleased to stay all further proceedings including arrest of thePetitionersiAccused Nos. 2 to 4 herein in Crime No.42812O22 ofPS KamareddyTown,Kamareddy District, for the alleged offences U/Sec.454,380 lPC.
This Petition coming on for hearing, uponperusing the lvlemorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and uponhearing the arguments of Sri V RAGHUNATH ,Advocate for the Petitionerand of Sri S. Ganesh, Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of theRespondentNo.1 and the None appeared for the Respondent No.2
The Court made the following:ORDER
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
CRIMINiAL PETITI ON No.984l of 2022
ORDER:
The lea ned r:ounsr_'l appcaring for the petitioners
slr bmitted that the matter h:rs become infructuous.
l. Recording the aloresarrl submission, the Criminal petition
is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellanr:ous Petitiotrs, pending if any, shall stand closed.
t
.)
Sd/. MOHD. SANAULLAHANSARI ASSIST4II-T REGISTRAR //rRUE CoPY// c2I)
SECTION OFFICER
To,
BJLB \F-
HIGH COURT
DATED:2710612O23
ORDER
CRLP.No.9841 ot 2022
ST^re
,)+
)6
I
c
2 E JUI 2tr8 t,
.),
!' -t, -
i 1l- rr5.. r,n , q.-.r€ ) -7
--:-r_,:;,- "./
CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS
>>
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kadarla Laxman
Kadarla Srinivas
Kadarla Bhaskar
The State of Telangana
Benjaram Kondal
Justice G. Anupama Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court