High Court dismissed a criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C as infructuous because the charge-sheet was filed after the petition was admitted, leaving no pending proceedings to quash.
None. The petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
l32s4l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 9842 OF 2022
Between:
...PETITIONERYACCUSED No.2,3 & 4
AND
... RESPONDE NTS/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Criminal Proceedings against the Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 to 4 herein in Crime No.93/2022 of PS Machareddy, Kamareddy District, for the alleged offences U/Sec.457, 380 lPC.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2022
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all furtherproceedings including arrest of the Petitioners/Accused Nos. 2 to 4 herein in Crime No.9312O22 of PS Machareddy, Kamareddy District, for the alleged offences U/Sec.457, 380 lPC.
This Petitiorr( lrling on for hearing, upon peru sing t.rr: l,4,:morandum of Grounds of C.rm n:1 Petition and upon hearng the ar3l.ments of Sri V RAGHUNATH, Advor ale for the Petitioner and of Sri t; GAIIE SH the Assistant Public Prosecutorr'or tf e State of Telangana on behalf of lhe Rer;pondent No.1 and None Appe,areJ lrr the Respondent No.2
The Court made the ollowing: ORDER
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
CRIMIN.{AL PETITION No.9a42 of 2022
ORDER:
This Criminalpetition is hled under Section 4g2 of tne Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the petitioners_accused Nos.2, 3 and 4, to quash the proceedings against them in Crime No.93 of 2022, on the file of the Station House Offtcer, Machareddy Police Station, Kamareddy District, registered for the olfences punishable under Sections 457 and 3gO I.p.C. 2. Learned Assistant public prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that the police, after complction of investigation in the subject crime, hled charge shect before thc Cour t concerned err-rd it was numbered as C.C.No. 19'l of 2022. Thereforc, nothing survives in this Criminal petition for adjudication.
-?.Recordingthe aforesaid submission, thc Criminal l)erition is disrnissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand
closed.
Sd/. V. KAVITHA ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
'A--=' SECTION OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2710( 12023
ORDER
. -:- :':- ::
. t/. lE
(
()
Ii 'r i \\" 'tt8 ti)7.
I
L)'
I r. i ' ./
CRLP.No.984i ot 2022
DISMISSING T HE CRL.PETITION
AS INFRUCTU CUS
a ['
o
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings under Sections 457 and 380 IPC ought to be quashed in the circumstances.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kadarla Laxman
Kadarla Srinivas
Kadarla Bhaskar
The State of Telangana
Mandha Sanjeevulu
G. Anupama Chakravarthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
