The High Court at Hyderabad dismissed Writ Petition No. 5874 of 2020 filed by Korra Ashok challenging a fine imposed on his vehicle as infructuous without costs.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; stand closed miscellaneous petitions; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY. THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE OR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
WRIT PETITION NO: 5874 OF 2020
Between:
Korra Ashok, s/o Samulal @ Ramulu, aged aboul 37 years, r/o H.No. 4-22, Gollabudharam Village, Bhupalpally I\4andal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District.
... PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Anicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of [,4andamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing the impugned order dt. 28-2-2020 bearing Cr.No. 1587l2O19lCPElTSlD1partially modifying the order passed by lhe 3rd respondent dt. 7-2-2019 in File No. 485l2018lPElB4 by imposing a fine of Rs. 1,50,0001 for release of the vehice bearing Reg.No. AP-36-TB-0378permanently, though the said vehicle is old vehicle pertaining to the year, 2012, as being illegal, and arbitrary, and to granl.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent herein to modify the order passed by the 2nd respondent dt. 282-2020 bearing Cr.No. 1 587/2019/CPE/TS/D 1 by accepting 20o/o of lhe amount from out of fine amount of Rs, 1,50,000/- pending disposal of the main Writ Petition, and to pass.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI.LAXMAIAH KANCHANI
Counsel for the Respondents : GP FOR PROHIBITION AND EXCISE (TG)
The Court made the following ORDER
THE HOll'BLEDr. IUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
wRIT PETITIONNo.5874 of 2O2O
ORDER:
Heard the l, arnedcounsel for the petitionerand perusedthe
record,
2, Learned cot nselfor the petitioner would submit that1o further orders arerequir(d to be passedin this writ petition'
dismissed asinfr rctuous.
Miscellane( us Petitions,if any,pendingin this writ petition shall
stand closed.Tt ereshall be no order as to costs'
SD/.K,AMMAJI
ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
\ I
//TRUE COPY//
(_
SEcTiONOFFICER
To'" 1 . T*oCCs to GFFORPROHIBITIONEXCISE(TG)' High Court fortheState of
Telanqana. [Ol.T] 2 o;; iC i; dRitnxuntnn KANCHANI,Advocate IoPUC]
T
HIGH COURT
DATED:02i0212022
G
.,,
s"
x. s'
..-r-
s<br>.. :_::, -:. T..-:'1r'.-"
ORDER
WP.No.5874 <t 2020
DISMISSINIi THE W.P
AS INFRUC TUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
^k
Korra Ashok
The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Excise), Department
The Commissioner, Proh. and Excise Nampally, Hyderabad
The Deputy Commissioner of Proh. and Excise, Warangal Division
The Station House Officer, Bhupalapally Proh. and Excise Station
Shameem Akther
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
