Writ petition filed to quash an FIR was dismissed as infructuous after the court accepted the petitioner counsel's submission that the subject matter had become infructuous. The matter was disposed of without costs.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH CO RT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNES AY, THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HO,BLE DT, JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
w lT PETITION NO:4604 OF 2017
Between:
Rama Chandramouli, S/o A baiah, Aged about 71 years, Occ: Propertor of IVI/s Rama Chandramouli Traders, lndaram Village, Jaipur Mandal, I\rlanchirial District, Telangana.
..,PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Artic e 226 ol the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumsta nces stated in th affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ of manda us or any other appropriate writ or order or direction declaring the action of th Respondent No.2 in registering FIR No.14 of 2017 ol Petitioner P.S.: Mancheria ,Telangana District, dated 11.01 .2017 as arbitrary and illegal and quash the same
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2 PMP. NO: 5553 OF 2017
Petition under Secti n 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppo of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondent Nos.2 to 4 not to evict or dispossess thepetitioner from land admeasuring 1 acre in s rvey No.396 situated at Siricilla village and l,4andal, Siricilla Rajanna Districtp ding disposal of the writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner SRI. PRABHAKAR PERI
Counsel for the Responde t Nos. 1 to 2: GP FOR HOME
Counsel for the Responde t No. 3: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court made the foll ing: ORDER
THE HON,BLEDT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
\TY RIT PTITIO N .4 o4 OF20 7
ORDER
Learnedcounsel for the petitioner would submit that the
subject/ls has become infructuous'
2 Recordingthe said submission,this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
MiscellaneousPetitions,ifany,pendinginthisWritPetition
shall standclosed.No costs'
SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANTREGISTRAR
//TRUECOPY//
SECTIO$---<.FrcER
\
To,
?It lts?" HYderabad. [OUT]
JS NPJ
fr
HIGH COURT
DATED: 210212022
$€ sl';1f€
q
c-) 14 FEB ?rfr-?.
c)
:t
ORDER
WP.No.4604 ot 2017
DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
@t{'u %a-. -'"V*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking quashing of FIR is maintainable in the stated circumstances.
Rama Chandramouli
State of Telangana
Shameem Akther
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
