Writ petition filed regarding non-filing of chargesheet and non-inaction by SHO. Court noted investigation completed and final report likely to be filed. Writ petition disposed without passing further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
I
(Special Original J urisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICESHAMEEM AKTHER
WRIT PETITION NO: 5202 OF20Zz
Between:
Sved Abdul Dastaoir. S/o M.A.Rasheed,agedabout45 yrs Occ' Business, Fyo Flat N6.1 1 . Kanthi Alibigh, Tigalkunta.Falakhnama. Hyderabad 500 002.
,..PETITIONER
AND
1 . The Government of Telangana,Represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat,B.R.B.K.Bhavan,Hyderabad.
7 SriKhoze.ernal"ryg,s/.?531"#1B'"",illiif,l,ijtfl5'"';9?l;,?Hi[11iOE/& H.No 3'18-36,Peddakamerartr 't,''u'urr''
...RES'ONDENTS
g',-m*N**ffi
IANo: F thatin the circumstan ces statedin sedto dlrect the theatfid4th PetitionresPo avittiled ndent/Undin er SHO supportSection BDLo{1 Bhanu51 the 380,CPC Petition,4 r 20, toPrayingtake 406 theofa ction Hight.P. cCourtI n by ftRconductimayt'to.+t be 2020 ng Pleaenqd t.06.o'1.2020uiry and file s undersection resentwrit fo r theoffence rthwithpending disPos al ofthe P ch argesheetfo
Counselfor the Petitioner: SRI'C'N'MOORTY
GPFOR HOME (TG)
Counselfor the Respondent Nos'1 to 4:
: NONEAPPEARED Counselfor the Respondent Nos 5 to 7
TheCourtmade the followingORDER
/
THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE SHAMEEMAKTHER
WRIT P ION No.5202 oF 2022
ORDER:
This writ Petition, under Article 226 ofthe Constitutionof India, is filed by thepetitioner,whereinthe following prayeris made:
"... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring (a) the inaction on the part of 4th respondent/SHO BDL Bhanur in not taking action in FIR No.4/2020 dt.06.01.2020 for the offences under section 3gO, 420,406 of I.p.C. based on the petitioner's, private comDlaint filed under sectiol 200 :l- __.r:"....rererred by the Hon,btelud;cial I Class Magrstrate, Sanga Reddy as illegat, ArOitrary, unconstitutional and contrary ro Art,cle fA, Zf uno-30-0,; of_the constitution of India and Vrolative ;;;r;;;;;;; Rrghts Guaranteed under the ConstitLrio; "i i;;;;";;; a9atnst conse-qu€ntly._direct the 7tn respondent the officiat ,esponOenti in; ,; ,;;; "":;; to pass such other orde. o|. o.6'utfrofdSntuwith law i6; un6
l
be filed before the Courtconcernedwlthin a shortperiod,afterdue
notice to the Petitioner.
7 with the above observation,the Writ Petition is disposedof'
Miscellaneous Petitions,if any, pending in this WritPetition
shall stand closed.There shall be no order as to costs'
SD!B.SATYAVATHI ASSI STANTREGISTRAR
,TRUECOPY//
SECTIONOFFICER
To'- r. Th" Principal Secretary' Government ofTelangana' Home Department' ' seitetarLi B.R.B.K Bhavan, Hyderabad
z in" il'p"'iht"nJentof Potit"Sanga Reddv District 5. fn" O"'prtvSuperintendent of PoliceSanga Reddy ;. il;5iJffiHolie or'cer. BDL BhanurPolic€ station 5 one ccto sri.c.N.[,4oonvAdvocate IoPUUI 6 i;; 6cJ t"Gp ron Ho'rt''ri'ii6iiiiin co'ittorthe state or relansanaat Hyderabad [OUT]
SA SW $-
HIGH COURT
OArEDi01l02l2022
ORDER
ffi
// !<br>iJo
2 S tEB 2022
!o
S"
\r
WP.No.5202 of 2022
OISPOSING OF THE W.P
I I
WITHOUT COSTS.
\od' ?Yu ^ -rdlY
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking direction to file chargesheet under Section 156(3) CrPC and for quashing of FIR should be required to be dismissed when investigation is completed and final report is
Sved Abdul Dastaoir
The Government of Telangana
The Superintendent of Police, Sanga Reddy District
The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sanga Reddy
Station House Officer, BDL Bhanur Police Station
Sri. S.R. Damodar Reddy
DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
