In a Public Interest Litigation seeking directions to initiate proceedings regarding irregularities in a cooperative society, the High Court held the petition infructuous and disposed of it without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OFJUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICESATISH CHANDRASHARMA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATIONNOl. 224OF 2012
Between:
P.Bhavani,, Wo Kalyan Ram,39 years, r/o Flat No 302, SaikiranApartments Block-ll, Srinagarcolony,Hyderabad-73
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of Constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the Affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court may; be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction morepartlcularlyone in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring that the actionof the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 in not initiating proceedings againstpersons responsiblefor irregularitiescommitted in respondent No.5 society as illegal andu nco nstitutiona I and consequently direct respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to initiate furtherpenal actionunder law and protectthe interest of the members of Grey Hounds Police.
PILMP. NO: 283OF 2012
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent Nos.1 to 4 to submit a resort to this Hon'ble Court about the action tak€)n on the rep rats recommendations submitted by respondents 2 and 3 pending disposal of tile Writ Petition.
Counsel for th,-' Petitioner: SRI K.S.MURTHY
Counsel for thr: Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR COOPERATION
Counsel for thr-. Respondent No.5: Smt.BOBBA VIJAYALAKSHMI
Counsel for thr: Respondent No.4: None Appeared
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
H E SATI
AND
H TI E AND SHA
P.I.L.No. of 2072
ORDER' eer the Ho','bh the Chie/ ltntc S,itrh ahandrd J hd,,,a)
l-earned counsel for the petitioncr submits thar the present
PIL has becomc infructuous.
In view of tlle same, the PIL is disposed of as infrucruous.
No costs
As a sequel, misccllancous pcrirtons, pcnding if any, stand
closed.
SD/.P.PADMAN REDDY ASSIST ISTRAR
\
//TRUECOPY//
SECTION OFFICER
'o'',. ,*o CCs to the GP for Cooperation' High Court for the State of Telangana TOUTI z b"n"e'dc to sRlK.S' MURTHY, noy999!9.[o.epcl . 5. SilE 6d i; 5;i.dobiiAVirnVamrsHMi'Advocate [oPUC]
SW X"-
'l
HIGH COLIRT
DATED:09'10612022
ORDER
5 iAI6
'(
o [ 4 []ff ?trI2
.T
.-n
1t Di s:i.f
PlL.No.22'4 of 2012
DISPOSING OF THE PIL
AS INFRUICTUOUS WITHOUT COSTSa)-
(r)
-"'
01 A^
iqll lru
P. Bhavani
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Satish Chandr Sharma
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
