High Court granted petitioners admission to MBBS under stray vacant seats as the decision to not consider their requests was declared arbitrary and inconsistent with legal principles., it was disposed of as infructuous because the entire counseling process was completed before the matter was adjudicated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 23107 OF 2022
Betwee n:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate order or direction or a writ more particularly in the nature of Mandamus and thereby declaring the action of the Respondents more particularly the action of the 2nd Respondent in not considering our request for participating in counseling and admission into MBBS course under management quota or NRI quota for the academicyear 2021-2022 as illegal, arbitrary, u nco nstitutio na I and consequently direct the Respondents to consider and including our names of the Petitioners for admission into MBBScourse under Management quota seats of C- category / NRIquota i.e., StrayVacant Seats for the academicyear 2021-2022 as lhe Petitionersready topay the concerned fees for such counselingprocess.
l.A.NO:1 OF 2022
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to inter alia pass an order in favour of the Petitioners directing the 4th Respondent for participation in the counseling to be held in near future for filling of the 1st year MBBS seats/ BDS seats under Management Quota seats i.e., C- category / NRI Quota seats which are other wisely termed as stray vacant seats in any medical colleges which are under the control of the 2nd Respondent tillpending disposal of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI.M.VENKATA SWAMY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : SRI.A.PRABHAKAR RAO
The Court made the following ORDER
T F TI TI AR,IA A\D
THE HON'BI-E SRI IUSTICE HINAND KT]MAR SHAVILI \Y. P.No. 23107 of 2022
RDIIR
Learncd Standing(lounscl For respondent No.2/l(aloii
Naravana lLao L nt".crsili oi I lcalth Scienccs has inlormcdthis (-ourt that the cntirc counsc[ng is ovcr and the writ petition has bccome in fructuou s.
In vicw of thc sarnc, tlrc \l'rit Pedtton is drsposcd ofas
in iructuous. No cos ts
r\s a scqr-rcl. misccllancous pctrtions, pcnding iI any, stand
c lo s t',-i
SD/-N.CHANDRA SEKHARRAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
V--"---
SECTION OFFICER
\
To
S.A BS
q
HIGH COURT
DATED:0810612022
1 E SIAT e
(
.t (
I
()r) 11 JUL 202 o
t
t
gO
, 9€spqrc$
ORDER
WP.No.23107 of 2022
DISPOSING OF THE W.P
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
el cryn' gg-'*xt)'
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Chervirala Roshini
Syed Dawood Kaif
The State of Telangana
Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences
Satish Chandra Sharma
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
