Petitioners filed a writ petition challenging orders of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal and consequential government memos. Counsel for petitioners sought withdrawal of the current petition with liberty to file a fresh one.
Withdrawal of the writ petition was allowed. Miscellaneous pending applications were dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
q
I
l:
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND ANDTWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HON'BLETHE CHIEFJUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITIONNO: 23385 OF 2022
Between:
| I | G.Shonkoroioh, S/o.Khosim,oged47yeors, DistrictPonchyotroj Engineer(FAC), Worongol, WorongolDist.,T.S. |
|---|---|
| 2) | R.Srinivosq Roo, S/.Rojonno,oged52yeors, DistrictPonchyotroj Engineer(FAC), Korimnogor, KorimnogorDis1.,T.S. |
| 3l | R.Chondrosekhor,So.Honumoioh, oged56yeors, DistriclPonchyolroj Engineer(FAC), Jongoon, JongoonDist.,T.S. |
| 4l | AbdulRohmon,S/o. ShoikModor, Aged53yoeors, DislrictPonchyotroj Engineer(FAC), Jogtiol,.JogtiolDist.,T.S |
| 5l | T.Sonkoroioh, S/o.Lochoioh,oged56yeors, DislrictPonchyotroj Engineer(FAC), Nirmol, NirmolDist..T.S. |
| 6l | R.Mohoveer,S/o.Noroyono,oged59yeors, DiskictPonchyot rojEngineer(FAC), Adilobod,AdilobodDist.,T.S. Petitioners |
| AND | |
| rl | G. Romulu,53yeors.S/o G. Loxmon, Occ:DepulyExecutive Engineer(DEE), PRIDivision,Kollopur,MohobubnogorDt., R/o H.No.l-9-98/8,S1ree1No.I, ModoveswomyNogorColony, Kollopur,MohobubnogorD1.509102. |
I tIt I
I I I I
A
i; I
iiI
T
?
| el | K.[ohonoRoo,Aged48Yeors, S/oiSriK.Audishworoioh.Occ:Depuly Executive Englneer,V&QCSubDivision, Mohoboobnogor,R/oFlot No.107, KorveyCVSMonsion,ModelColonY, NeorESIHospitol,Hyderobod-500 038. |
|---|---|
| t0l | P.Siddiromulu,Aged5lYeors, S/oSrlP.Venkoteswom,Occ:DePutY Executive Engineer,PRISubDivision, Muhugodo, NolgondoDislrict, Rlo1-10-\22/1,Flot No.202,VenkotVillo, AshokNogor, HYderobod-500 020. |
| 111 | M.RomomohonoRoo,Aged48Yeors, S/oSriM.PonduRongoRoo,Occ:Depuly ExecuiiveEngineerotPIUSubDivision, Hoyotnogor,RongoReddYDistrict, R/oI7-l-39,l/V/59,SoroswoiiNogor, Soidobod,HYderobod' |
| 121 | G.Anil,Aged53yeors,S/oSriG. Romoswomy, Occ:DepulyExecutiveEngineer,PRISub Dlvision,Siddipet,MedokDistrict,R/oFlot No. 301,PlolNo.l9MitroSoiTowers, Probhot Nogor,ChoilonYoPuri, Hyderobod-500 060. |
| t3l | V,lRovindronoih,Aged56 Yeors, Occ:DePutYExeculiveEngineer, PRISubDivision,Shodnogor, MohoboobnogorDislricl,R/oH.No 6-6-437,Gondhinogor,Kovodigudo, Secunderobod-500003. |
| !/ 1+l "i'{ ill |
J.Joipol,Aged53yeors,S/oSri K.Keshoioh. 'Occ:Deputy ExeculiveEngineer,PRISub Dlvision,Noroyonkhed,MedokDistrict, lR/oPlot No.31,SSEnclove,YoProl, Secunderobod. Respondenls/ AppliconlsinOANo.9359 |
it
! I
...RES'.NDENTS/ . RESPONDENTSIN O.A.NO.9359OF 2013
Petition underArticle226 of lhe constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavitfiled therewith,the High courtmaybe pleased to grant appropriaterelief more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus under Article226oftheConstitutionoflndiadeclaringtheordersoftheHonbleAP. AdministrativeTribunalDated16.o7.2014passedinO.A.No.9359of2013as erroneousandallotherconsequentialproceedingsissuedbytherespondents, includingMemosNo.No.3448lEngg.Estt./A2l2O19-5,dated02.03-2021issued bythelgthRespondentandconsequentialMemoNo.Ser-V(2)/38B712011,dated 17-04-2014, andMemoNo. Ser-l(2)/3887t2011(Zone-V-'1) dated 31-3'2022' Memo No. Ser-ll(2)/26404/'1999-Zone-Vl-1dated 31 '032022'Memo NoSer- ll(2)12640411g99-Zone-Vl-2dated 3l '03'2022' andMemo No Ser- |l(2)t2640411g99-Zone.Vl-3dated3l.o3.2o22allissuedbythe20threspondent. asarbitrary,illegal,voidandwithout.iurisdictionviolatingArticlesl4'16and21 oftheConstitutionof|ndiaandsetasidethesameandissueconsequential direction, restrainingthe respondentsfrom implementingthe ordersof the Hon,bleA.P-AdministrativeTribunaldated16.07.2O14ino.A.No.9359of2013 andallotherconsequentialproceedingsissuedbytherespondents'including Memos No.No.3448/Engg.Estt./A2l2O19-5,dated O2-Og-2021issued by the lgth RespondentandconsequentialMemoNo.Ser.V(2)i3BB7l2011,dated17-04. 2014, and MemoNo. Ser-l(2)/3887/2011(Zone-V-1 ) dated 31-3-2022' Memo No Ser-ll(2)/26404/'1999-Zone-Vl-'1dated31 '03'2022'Memo No Ser- ll(2)126404t1g99-Zone-Vl-2dated g1 '03'2022' andMemo No Ser- |l(2)t264o4tlg99.Zone.Vl.3dated31.o3.2022allissuedbythe20threspondent.'
lA NO: I 2022
Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to grant leave to the petitioners to file the present writ petition seeking the relief as sought in the Writ Petition as stated above
lA NO:2 OF 2022
Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Hon'ble A. p. Administrative Tribunal dated 16.07.2014 rendered in o.A. No.9359 of 2013 and consequentiar Memo No.Serv(2)138871201'1 , dated 1z-04-2014, and N4emo No. ser-r(2)/3887t201r(zone-v-1) dated 3'1-3-2022, Memo No. ser-il(2)/2640411999-zone-Vr-r dated 3i.03.2022, Memo No.ser-ll(2)12640411999-Zone-v1-2 dated 31 .03.2022, and Memo No.serll(2)12640411999-Zone-Vt-3 dated 31 .03.2022 ail issued by the 20th respondent., pending disposal of this writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI p. V. KRISHNAIAH
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 15to 17: Gp FOR SERVICES (Ap)
Counsel for Respondent Nos. 18lo20; Gp FOR SERVICES (TG)
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
THE HON'BI-E THE CHIEF IUSTICE SA IS H CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HO ,BLE SRI IUSTIC E ABHINAND KTiNl,\R SHAVILI W.P.No.2 85 of 2022
ORDER. ar.,r, t tot ht tt\ t.ih! ttn/.t \ttt,t, I i, it:ht \ i\t,,),
I-carned counsel frrr rhc pcuri()ncrs pra.s ti )r rvithdras,al of the prcsenr writ pctition with a libcrtv r() rhc peririoners ro filc r
fresh rvrit pcuti()n in casc nccd s() ariscs in futurc
In vieu, oI thc abovc, thc Writ ])cririon is dismrsscd :1S
*,ithdran,r.r \:itlt tltc lfirrcslirl libr.rrr. \o cosrs.
t\s a scqucl, mlsccllanc()us pcriri()r-rs, I)cndinq iI anr,, stantl
dismissed.
":BfBl'AIIA',t1il //TRUE COPY// sec/rffiorrrcen
t'' 1 ?: 33 Ji"S8 5 rir3:Ssgfi ir''i t I"J X.tl n,."P ra d e sh' A ma ravathi' . t*:,t';*l'3tptP|,I"r,"es,Hish court ror the state or retansana. [our]
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0810612022
1tr- J lrl
o^l
7Q
),,
ao 0 2 AUi 2[22 c,
-L
<br>* aFSDT.TC',ri
ORDER
WP.No.23385 of 2022
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION
WITHOUT COSTS
@
{Y
(D (r*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking quashing of Administrative Tribunal orders and ensuing memos is maintainable.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
G.Shonkoroioh
R.Srinivosq Roo
R.Chondrosekhor
AbdulRohmon
T.Sonkoroioh
R.Mohoveer
Satish Chandra Sharma
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
