This court disposed of Public Interest Litigation No. 192 of 2012 as infructuous upon the submission that the matter had become devoid of any purpose.
The PIL was disposed of as infructuous; miscellaneous applications, if any, to be closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURTFORTHE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY. THE ELEVENTHDAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLETHE CHIEFJUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATIONNO:192OF2012
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
PetitionUnder Article 226 of the Constitutionof-lndiaprayingthat in the circumstancesstatedin tfre attiOaltliteO therewith' the High Court may be pleasedto issue a writ,order or airectioi, one-moie particutartyin .the natureof Writ of Mandamus toi) declare tf,e action ot in" Cou"tnrnunt in continued palronageof the 5; R;;p;;;;tln in" to,. ot'r-erease of advertisements in respectof Government Deoartments andPublic uno"'t",x-ingsas being contrary to G.o.Ms.No.403,dated ;i[?.ifii;"";;it,r.vi"o irr"g;i, ;eingin vio'iation or article14 or the constitution to the 1stRespondent to forthwithto of india ii) andissue "on."qu""nii"t-Jire"ction to the Governmentand Public Undertakings "i"pir'" i!r"r." "JvertisemenG
I.A. N O:1 OF 2012(PILMP. NO: 2 350F 12\
Petition UnderSection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin tn" xtio"uitiii"o in support or t,e petiiion,in"-HignCourt may be pleasedto direct the 1sfRespondentto revrew iiJ t'oj""t of isiueof advertisementsto the 3rd Respondentin respectot Cou"'nti"ii6ep"ttrnentt -"noPublic Undertakings on the basis of theparameters raio oownln C'O'tr4s No 403' dated 21'O7 '1992
Counselfor the Petitioners : SRIP'GOVINDREDDY
Counselforthe Respondent Nos l & 2: GP FORGENERAL ADMINISTRATION
Counselfor the Respondent Nos 3 & 4 : NONEAPPEARED
The Courtmade the followingORDER
THE ISH CI{I
AND
THE HON'BLESRI ABHINAND
SIIA.VILI
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATIONNO.192 of 2OL2
ORDER: eer lheHon'bletheChierJuslice SalishCiotldrufjl,orto)
Learned counselfor the petitionersis fair enough in informing thisCourt that the public interestlitigation has become infructuous.
The public interestlitigation is accordingly disposed of as infructuous.
The miscellaneousapplications pending,if any, shall
stand closed. Thereshalibe no order as to costs'
SDAK.ONESIM ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
Go
SECTION OFFICER
To l.ThePrincioalsecretary,GovernmentofAP,GeneralAdministration(l&PR) Department,secretariatBuildings,Hyderabad ^ 2. il;6;;;i;dioner,lnformation'and Public Relations Dept Samachar Bhavan'
A.C Guards, Hyderabad- 500 028 s r*o cc;i6'cF ibn oeNrnelADI,'llNlsrRATloN,Highcourtforthe state of Telangana at Hyderabad. IOUTI +. one ic to sRl.i,.GovlNdREDDY,Advocate [oPUC]
HIGH COURT
DATED:1110212022
-{HE sI4
( o;
)
I
)
O 2 6 FiB 2gp
ORDER
PlL.No.192 of 2012
DISPOSING OF THE P.I.L
AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
@ X#L>\
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Borla Ramaswamy
C. Dharma Reddy
Government of A.P.
Information and Public Relations Department
Ushodava Enterprises Private Limited
Ushodava Enterprises Private Limited
Satish Chandra Sharma
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
