In Writ Petition No. 32961 of 2016 filed by Akber Mohiuddin Ansari challenging G.O.Ms.No.113 and section 101 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganization Act, 2014, the Telangana High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn by the petitioner without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRASHARMA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMARSHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 32961 o F 2016
Between:
AKBER l,loHlUDDlN ANSARI,, S/o.Late KhajaMohiuddinAnsari,Occ Business, Rio.1 9-3-363, Shamsheergunj,Aliabad, Hyderabad-Ts
...PETITION ER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of theConstitutionof lndia praying that in the circumslances statedin theaffidavit filed therewith,the High Court may be pleasedto issue a Writ, Order or Directionmore particularlyone in the nature of Writof Mandamus declaring theword ofrepeal' undersection 101of Act 6 of 2014 shallbe struck down to the extentof words 'whetherby way of repealor amendment'of section 101 of Act 6 of 2014 olAndhra Pradesh ReorganizationAct 2014as excessive delegation andcontrary to law and consequentlyto set aside G.O.Ms.No.113, Revenue(Land Matters) Department dt01-06-2016issuedby the Government ofTelanganaand pass such otheror further ordersin theinterest of justice or in the alternative Hon'ble Court may bepleasedto hold that the ,discrimination of pre-cognizance and post cognizance referred in the GO as illegal directing the applicationfiledby the writ petitionerin LGCR No.2636/09 on the file of special court underAP LandGrabbing (Prohibition)Act be transferred to the competent court asper law in the interestof justice
l.A. NO:'1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO:40775 OF 2016)
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayinq that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the transfer of cases to respective courts in terms of G.O.Ms.No,113, Revenue (Land I\4atters) Department, dt.01-06-20'16 pending drsposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B. SAILESH SAXENA
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: N RAJESHWAR RAO (AST SOL GEN)
Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: GP FOR LANO ACQUISITION
Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: FORMAL PARTY
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE IION'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISII CIIANDRA STIARMA AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABIIINAND KUMAR SIIAVILI
WRIT PETITION No.32961 of 2O16
ORDER: lPer the Hon bLe the Chie| Justtce Sansh Chandru Sho.nna)
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the u,rit petition, Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/- T.JAYASREE
ASslsrAH:GlsrRAR
//TRUE coPY/i
To, SECTION oFFtcER
1. One CC to SRt B. SATLESHSAXENA Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to SRt N. RAJESHWAR RAO (AST SOL GEN) Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to SRt Gp FOR GENERAL ADM|N|STRAT|ON Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to SRt Gp FOR LAND ACeUtStTtON Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CD Copies.
6. One spare copy.
NPJ
SW
HIGH COURT
DATED:1110212022
ORDER
WP.No.32961 of 2016
g STAIF
/)
(
o:)tt 03 UAR 202
L)
\ I
DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS.
/ /
I
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Akber Mohiuddin Ansari
Union of India
State of Telangana
Registrar, A.P. Land Grabbing Tribunal
Satish Chandra Sharma
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
