The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging the government promotion of a doctor facing a pending criminal case. The Court held that the petition had become infructuous and ordered its dismissal without costs.
Writ petition declared infructuous and disposed of without costs; miscellaneous applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURTFOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (S pecial Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY. THE ELEVENTHDAYOF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTY TWO
PR ES ENT
THE HONOURABLE THECHIEFJUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION PUBLIC INTERE STLITIGATIO N NO:192 OF 2017
Between:
Telanoana GovernmentDoctors Association (TGGDA),Vaidy a Bhawan, KingKoti, Hydeabad Rep. by its PresidentPallam Praveen Kumar, S/o P . Satyanarayana, aged about : 46yrs.
.PETITIONER
AND
RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lvlandamus declaring the action of respondent nos.1 to 3 in considering the promotion of respondent no.4 as Professor of Anesthesiology in Gandhi Hospitals, Secunderabad in G.O. Rt No.496, dated 24.O5.2017 even though there is a criminal case pending against him vide crime no.24712014 in PS Sultan Bazar U/s. 120 B and 406 IPC and considering the respondent no.4 for promotion by respondent nos.1 to 3 in G.o. Rt No.496, dated 24.05.2017 is illegal, arbitrary, malafide against to the principles of natural justice and against to the G.O No.2201 1/4/91-Estt.(A) Government of lndia, [/]inistry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, Department of Personnel & Training, North Block, New Delhi, dt. 14.09.1992.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WP(P|L)MP. NO: 391 OF 2017)
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay on the proceedings issued by respondent nos.'1 to 3 in G.O. Rt No.496, dated 24.05.2017 in favour of respondent no.4 Dr, M. Veersham considering his promotion as Professor of Anesthesiology at Gandhi N,4edical College / Hospital pending disposal of this writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI.SRINIVASA RAO PACHWA
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 3 :
GP FOR MEDICAL,HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : GP FOR GENERAL ADM|N|STRATION Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following ORDER
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISII
SIIARMA
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABTIINAND KUMAR SIIAVILI
WRIT PETITION(PIL ).No.192 of 2OL7
ORDER: eer the Hon'ble lhe C/riel Ju-strce Sotrsh('/kwlra Strcrnn)
Learned counsel for the petitioner is fair enough in
informing this Court that the writ petition has become infructuous.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous.
The miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall
stand closed. There sha-ll be no order as to costs.
SD/.B.SATYAVATHI
//TRUE COPY'
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
fL-
I
SECTION OFFICER
To
2 The Director of lvledical Education,Government of Telangana, Kothi, Hyderabad 4. Two CCs to GP FOR MEDICAL,HEALTHANDFAN4ILYWELFARE,HighCourt for the State of Telangana. [OUT] TWO CCS tO GP FOR GENERALADN/INISTRATION,
HIGH COURT
DAIED:1'110212022
ORDER
WP(PlL).No-192of 2017
1 $E STA
q"
o()J 26 FEB 2022
lr
DlsPoslNc oFTHEW.P. (PlL) AS INFRUCTUOUS,WITHoUTcosrs.
Nz l,"" @
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the promotion of a doctor convicted in a criminal case is maintainable.
Telangana Government Doctors Association (TGGDA) Rep. by Pallam Praveen Kumar
The State of Telangana
Prinicipal Secretary, General Administration Department
Dr. M. Veersham
Satish Chandra Sharma
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
