Butti Sharada v. The State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
THE ST rtp..,,,' 6l5fj l:,:f#".,*f AT…
THE ST rtp..,,,' 6l5fj l:,:f#".,*f AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURI FOR THE ST rtp..,,,' 6l5fj l:,:f#".,*fAT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, T o * o r.ln o.ifi S TflEnI.:S,ig r. '*
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTTCE T. AMARNATH GOUD
Between:
WR IT PE TITIO NNO :7372AF2021
R 3lff : ilf; ,33 R,o H N o 1 _ 84i 1, "y,r", ".31';;,*"?1r !"J,l n "u{:e !.; 3,:?; 5 :y:tq?
AND
.,.PETITIONER
i ilRTi, [f,% l',.i!'.:ilt'jt S ecre ta ry, R e ve n u e De pa rrm en r ] $lii.]ii?ii'E 5iiS?,?ltfj:;,^ff l?iiSiirf ,:rtwf,itlHIfl llfl ,,,j!,,75,.13i"
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be preased to issue a writ, order or direction and more particurarry one in the nature of writ of Mandamus decraring the action of the respondents in not furnishing information under Right to lnformation Act, 2005 in respect of the rands in sy.No.239, z4o,2soand 251 '1964 to 2000 and Khasra, sessara 1-B pahanis situated at rhummaroor Maheshwaram Mandar, Ranga Reddy District even after payment of the desired amount by way of D.D. is arbitrary, illegal and in violation of Article 14, 21 and 300_A of the Constitution of lndia.
lA NO:'1 OF 2021
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to provide information to the petitioner under RTI Act, 2005 in respect of the lands in Sy.No.239, 240,250 and 251'1964 to 2000 and Khasra, Sessala 1-B Pahanis situated at Thummaloor Village, lvlaheshwaram Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. A. RAMA KRISHNA (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLESRI JUSTICE T' AMAI{NATHGOUD WRITPE,TITIONNo.7372of2021
ORDER:
)n onbehalf of petit.ionerwhen the Thereis no representatl( Therefore,this matteris called. Earlier also' it was adjournedtwice'
writpetition is dismissed for non-prosecution'No orcler as to costs'
Pendingmiscellaneousapplications' ifany' shatl stand closed
SD/. K.VENKAIAH I\SSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY' SEcT|bilbFFICER
1 To, I
Hyderabad. [OUTI
3, Two CD Copies
CHR
CJ
HIGH COURT
DATED:0210612021
ORDER
W.P.No.7372 of 2021
1 ..19 STAf €
Y
?
z
oo 11 JUN 2021 t')
5.
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
(
V
A. Rama Krishna
Secretary, Revenue Department
T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court