Dismissed

Shri Ram General Insurance Company Limited v. Yenkola Raju , Prasa Raju and Another

Telangana HC1 Jun 2021MACMA/2323/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the motor accident appeal by confirming a Lok Adalat settlement where the insurance company agreed to pay the tribunal-awarded compensation and both parties withdrew competing appeals.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of MACMA No.2323 of 2017 and MACMA No.512 of 2017; Insurance company to deposit compensation; no order as to costs.

Shri Ram General Insurance Company Limited Vs… — Motor Accident Claims | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JUNE

¶3

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD

¶6

M.A.C.M.A, NO: 2323 OF 2017

¶7

Appeal under Section 173 of M.V.Act, against the Order and decree made in IVVOP No.2315 of 2011 dated 11/03/2016 on the file of the Court of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -cum- XIV Additional Chief Judge,^(Fast Track Court), City Civil Courts, Hyderabad.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Shri Ram General Insurance Company Limited, Represented by its Branch Manager, D.No.3-6-478, lll Floor, Anand Estate, Liberty, Himayatnagar, Hyderabad.

¶10

...APPELLANT/RESPONDENT NO.2

¶11

AND

¶12

Yenkola Ra.ju @ Parasa Raju, S/o. lr4allesh, Age : 20 Years, Occupation^: Agriculturist and milk vendor, R/o. H.No.'1-'19, Nacharam, Hyderabad,

¶13

2, Banda Ganesh, S/o. Narsimha, Age: Major, Occupation:Business,^H.No.6- 261ts11, Babanagar, Kapra, R.R.Dist.⁽ Owner of the TATA Van^{bearing No. AP-} 29-v-0321)

¶14

...REspoNDENTS/pETtrtoNERs

¶15

For the Appellant : SRI K.AJAY KUMAR, Advocate

¶16

For the Respondents : NONE APPEARED

¶17

The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT

¶18

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD

¶19

MACMA No.2323 OF 2Ol7

¶20

JUDGMENT:

¶21

During the pendency of the appeal, the matter was refcrred to the Lok Adalat, and the same was settled before the Lok Adalat, vide Award dated 74,12,2019

¶22

Accordingll', the MACMA is disposcd of, in rerms of rhc as alcl prLssccl bl Lhc l-ol< Aclulat. No ordr:r' rrs lo costs.

¶23

Conscqucntl'. rnist'r:lkrltcous pr:Litions. il ar-rr. pt,nr.1ir.tg in

¶24

this appc:Ll shcLll stancl closcd.

¶25

Sd/.B.SATYAVATHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /iTRUE COPY//

e:o

SECTION OFFICER

'1 ' The chairman, Motor Accidents-craims Tribunar -cum- XrV Additionar chief ^^{Judge,_(FastTrack Court), Citv Civir Courtiliiui"rlt"o} ? 9n"^{CC to Sri K.Ajay Kuriiai.} Aor"lrt"i6i;udi"''' 3. Two CD Copies

¶31

...^{(along with a copy of the award)}

Kj.

&_-

HIGH COURT DATED:01/06/2021

¶36

JUDGMENT

¶37

MACMA.No.2323 ol 2017

¶38

a 1HE sIA ,{:
o
\a(
oJ
(.)
2 2 irr 2|]2t
.',
:,/

¶39

DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL IN TERMS OF THE LOK ADALAT AWARD.

¶40

%,',

¶41

BEToBEiTHE^{LOK ADATAT}

¶42

HELD AT HYDERAEAD

¶43

[Orgonized^{ny Xigh Cou4Legol ServicesCdmmittee}

¶44

nign court lor^tnd Stote^{of Telongono}

¶45

¶46

Under Seciion^{l9 of 'the Legol Services Au'lhoriliesAct' 1987(Cen'jrolAcl)l}

¶47

MACMA.No. 512 of ;20171&^{MACMA No'2323o12017}

¶48

ladroreitne^{Hdri'bleHigh court)}

¶49

(Agoinsl the Or{ d,r iri o.P. No:2I 315 ol 2Ol I^{on lhe file of the} MACT - cum -^{XIV Ad} dl .lcrriet tudrsL (fTc) city clvil Courts,^Hyderobod) ri

¶50

MA CMA No.^{512ol 2} 17

¶51

Yenkolo Roju^{@ PorosoRojuS/o. Mollesh,} ,rppellotrl Age: 20^{yeors,Occ: Agricullurist ond} Milk vendor,^{R/o.H.No.l-l 9,} Nochorom, HYderobod. 1r Bondo Gonesh^{S/o. Norsim} ho, Age: Molor, .nespondenls I occ: Business,^{H.N0.6-2618/1, Bobonogor'} I rop,o,^{Rongo Reddy District}

¶52

I 2 Shrirom Generol^{lnsuronceCompony} Limiled,^{ReP.bY its Bronch Monoger,} Door No.3-6-478.^{AnondEstoie, Liberty'} Himoyothnogor,^HYderobod. L

¶53

MACMA No. 2323 of 2017
Appe lls nll ResPo nd e nl No.2 I Shrirom Generol lnsuronce ComponY
Limited, ReP. bY its Bronch Monoger'
I Door No.3-6-478, Anond Estote,
Liberty, HimoYoihnogor, HYderobo
I
I Y e n ko Io Roj U @ P o so R ol U S o. Mql lesh,
Itespondents / Petitioners s 2A v o rs oCc As n c U 1 U I st onb
M I L k e nd or R o H N o l I 9 N ocho/o m
H d e Io b od
2 Bondo Gonesh S/o. Norsimho, Ag Mojor,
Occ: Business, H.No.5-26i B/1, Bobohogor'
I T.qin iopro, von Rongo beoring Reddy No. Dlstridt' AP 29 V 0321){ownbr of the
ltlo. ol proceedings of the High Courl Legol^serv.ices Commitiee:
crnorn noc.No.t s1IHCLSC/2019, Doted 1 1-12'20191
:: Presenl::
: Hon'ble Sri Juslice K.Lokshmon,
lvorne of Choirmon
Judge, High Courl for the Slole ol Telongono

¶54

nio f e rs
o
a./,* t'sxi;ll'
(

¶55

Sri C.Norender^{ReddYAdvocote,}

¶56

:(1) High Court^{for the Stote of Telongono}

¶57

(2) Smt.P.S.Monjulo^{Kumor, Advocole} Higlr Court^{for the Stote of Telongono/} Sociol^Worker.

¶58

¶59

AWARD

¶60

The dispure between rhe poriies hoving been referred for determinotion to the LOK ADALAT qnd the porlies hqving compromised the cose / motter, the following Aword is possed in terms of lhe sefilement:

¶61

' r' Both the oppeors viz MACMA No.S12 0f 2017 0ndMACMA No.2323 0f 2017 t,ed out of the order doted 11-03-2ol6possed in op.No. 2315 0f 2011 on ihe file of the Motor Accidenl Cloims Tribunol _ cum _ Xtv

¶62

Addt. Chief Judge (FiC), City Civil Court, Hyderobod. The oppeot MACMA No.5l2 of 2Ol7 wos filed by lhe Cloimonl/pelilioner ond fhe oppeoi MACMA No. 2323 of 2Ol7 wos filed by the tnsuronce Compony.

¶63

2 Respondenl No.2/Appellont Shrirom Genero lnsuronce Com;tony

¶64

Limited, represented by S. Chondro Shekor Redd y, Assistont Monor;er

¶65

- Legol is present ond he seeks permission to with drow the oppeol i.e.. /vlACMA No.2323 ot 2Ol7 os the Insuronce Com Pony is not inleresied tn pursing lhe oppeol filed by ihem ond ogreed to poy lhe co m pe nsoti on qmount to the cloimoni/Appellq n1 os oworded by the Trib unol without disturbing ihe oword posse d by the Tribunol

¶66

tL SE
o
I(, HIGH COURT
LOK ADALAT
a,

¶67

¶68

1. ct imont/Appeliont/Respondenf No.l is present olong with his counsel Sri T.Vishwo Rupo Chory Adv Pcote ond represented thot

¶69

lhey qlso intends to withdrow the op {eol^{MACMA No.5tZ of 20ll}

¶70

iled by them ond ogreed to receive the compensotion omount os

¶71

oworded by the Tribunol.

¶72

The lnsuronce Compony/Respondenl No.2/Appellonl hos to deposit the compensotion or perod or two (2),J::i:; ;::::j ji.:;,1,::::J,I;: order ofter giving due credit fo the omounl olreody deposited. ln the even of defoull, the ogreed omouni sholi corry inleresl @ l2% pcr onnum from the dote of defoult. Upon such deposit, iher croimont/Appe,ont/Respondent No.2 is perm,red to wiihdrow the omounl.

¶73

¶74

5 In view of the obove represenlotions mqde by bolh the porties, the oppeols MACMA No.Si 7 of 2OtTond MACMA No.2323 of 20tl stonds disposed of os wilhdrtwn.

&'4.

Jt?7'

The^porties ore informed ihol^{the court fee. if ony. poid by ony of} them sholl be refunded.

¶79

¶80

No order os to the costs of^the oppeols.

¶81

l ance Co. utu'
Genet
tor Shrrtan
? ?d)"4
od S\gnatolt
Appello nl n MACMA
Cloimo ntlAppellonl in MACMA
No.2323/20 17 & Respondenl
No.51212O17 & Respondent No.1 in
No.2/lnsuro nce Compony in
MACMA No.2323/2017
MACMA No.5'12 ol 20 1 7
I
C I lor I
Cloimont/App lonl in MACMA Counsel fo] Appellonl in MACMA
No,512/20'17 & Respondenl No.1 in No.2323/2017 & Respondenl
MACMA No.2323/2017 No.2/lnsuronc e Compony in
___ A Ae$ANo,5]2 qf 2Ql7 _
/"/
(.,/
./.
-,c hotrmo n Member Memb r
..8f;RTIFIED
Sa-i),,a
T0 nE TRTJE CfiP'r
o
4.1 2.2019.
Io
SECRIiTAP.Y
High Court LegalScrvrces Comnr i, r, u
!, for the Stato of Telangan?
{Seol of th omm ittee) High Court Buildings, Hyderabad.5r,! J6ri

¶82

llote: 1 4.1 2.2019.

Shri Ram General Insurance Company Limited v. Yenkola Raju , Prasa Raju and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri Ram General Insurance Company Limited v. Yenkola Raju , Prasa Raju and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Avula Narsaiah Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

Sri G. Srinivas Reddy Vs The State of Telangana, And 3 Others

Ramgiri Pochaiah Vs Sri Kallem Sanjeeva Reddy and another

Lavudya Rajkumar Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Jetti Agri Science (Opc) Private Limited Vs The State of Telangana and another

Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, Vs P.Renamma