Disposed

Smt. Miryala Sunitha v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC2 Jun 2021WP/11580/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed by Smt. tViryala Sunitha and others challenging allotment of government lands to locals. Petitioners sought direction to District Collector to consider their representation for local allotment and notification to Sub-Registrar to stop registration of documents regarding lands allotted to non-locals.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 2nd respondent to consider the petitioners' representation dated 16.07.2020 and pass appropriate orders within three months.

Smt. Miryala Sunitha Vs The State of Telangana — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 11580 OF 2021

¶7

Between:

¶8

1 Smt. tViryala Sunitha, W/o. Shahidher, Aged about 32^{years,Oc!. Pvt: Teacher.} Fl/o. H.N-o. 6-8-82, Hanuman Nagar, Chinavenkat Reddy^{function Hall, Nalgonda,} Telangana - 508001

¶9

2 Smt. Nandadeepam Jayaprada, W/o.^{NandadeepamMallesharyAged} 19^yg?r9' Occ. Coliee Ryo. tt.No.'6-b-82, Hanuman^{Nagar. NearVenkata Sai Function Hall,} Nalgonda, Telanga na-S0800^{1 .}

¶10

3 Sm[ Nandadee[am Bhoolaxmi,^{W/o. Anjaiah,aged about.} .45^{years, Occ.} Coliee, R/o. H.No. 9-18/1 , Someshwara^{Tdmple,Kolanapaka, Yadadri-Bhongir,} Telanga na-5081 01

¶11

4 Smt. Miryala Shankaramma. W/o Uppalaiah,^{Kolanupaka village, Aged a.qoqt} ,5p years. OLt. Coliee, R/o. H.No. 9-16. Someshwara^{Temple, Kolanapaka, Yadadri-} Bhongir, Telangana-508101

¶12

...pETl,oNERS

¶13

AND

¶14

The State of Telangana, Rep^{by its Principal Secretary. RevenueDepartment,} Secretariat, BRKRBhavan,^{Tank Bund, Hyderabad.}

¶15

The District Collector, Yadadri-Bhongir^{District, Bhongir,}

¶16

tne Distri"t Schedule Casts^{ServiceiCo-Operative Society, NalgondaDistrict,} Nalgonda. Telangana.

¶17

- ihe-Tahsildar, K6lanupaka^{Viltage, Alair lr/andal, Alair, Yadadrr-Bhongir District} 5. The Sub-Registrar, Kolanupaka^{Village, Alair mandal, Yadadri-BhongirDistrict.} Telangana.

¶18

6 Smi. Vadluri Vinoda,^{W/o Chandraiah, Aged.55 Years, OccHousewife,R/o'} H.No.1-2-72, Sahstiryanagar,^{Vemulawa-da,Rajanna-SirsillaDistrictTelangana}

¶19

z. Smt Viryata Mallamma,^{Wo Ra.ja Veeraiah,Ag-ed. 53 ygars'.O9c} .Housewife H.No.1-2-5811, Sahstiryanagar,^{Vemulawada, Rajanna-SirsillaDistrict.} Telanoana.

¶20

g. Smi Ni'irata Susheela, W/o Nagalingam'. aged. 52 years,.Oc! Housewife Fyo. 1-2:80, Sahstiryanagar,^{Vemulawada, Rajanna-SirsillaDistrict.Telangana.}

¶21

g. Smt tt/irvala Vairam'ma, Wlo Siddhaiah, aged. 49 years, Occ. Housewife, FJo.. H. No.¹ -2-77, Sahstiryanagar,^{Vemulawada, Rajanna-Sirsilla District'} Telangana.

¶22

f O.Smi. - Miryala Lingamma, W/o^{Vijay Kumar, aged 51 years,.Occ' Hous.ewife, Fl/o'} Someshivara Strlet, Someshw6ri^{Temple, Kolanupdka Village, Alair Mandal,} Naloonda District. Telanqana.

¶23

f r. SmiNanOaoeepam^{pirijitna,W/o lvlahesh,aged. 38 Yeq11-o-cg, Housewife,} nio. Sfrop No.41 , Venki^{internet,Surylok Complex, Opp' HDFC Bank'} Hyderabad Road, Nalgonda.

¶24

rZ.$i,t. flJnOadeepim Yishoda,^{W/o Venkatesh,aged-39 y9,1s-.} Qcc^Housewife' - F/o. Sfrop No.4i, Venki lnternet, Surylok Complex, Opp. HDFC Bank, Hvderabad Road, Nalgonda.

¶25

lg Sirl Nindadeepam Vijramma,^{W/o Rajaveeraiah, aged58 years'O"9} .,.,, Housewife, R/o'. Some3hwara^{Street, Someshwara Temple, KolanupakaVrllage,} Alair Mandal, Nalgonda^{District,Telangana.}

¶26

...RES'ONDENTS

¶27

Petition under Article^{226 of lhe constitution of lndiapraying that in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavitfiled therewith, the High court may be pleased to} issue a Writ of^Mandamus directing the 2nd^{respondent toconsider} the of the^{petitioner requestinghim to enquire} into representation dt.^16.07.2020 allotment of assignment^{lands to non-localsand with a furtherrequestto allot the} same to the local^{residents like the petitioners herein, as illegal, arbitrary and against} the settled^{principtesof law and consequently direct the unofficial respondents not to}

¶28

¶29

enter into any^{sale transactionsto create third party rightsand direct the 5th} respondent to not to^{registerthe documents with respect to the governmentproperty} allotted to the unofficial^respondents.

¶30

IANO:1OF 2021

¶31

Petition under Section^{151 CPC prayingthat in the circurnstances stated in the} affidavit filed in support^{of the petition,the High court mayber pleasedto directthe} Sth respondent^{not to entertain any register documents in respect of the Government} property allotted to the unofficial^{respondentsin Sy Nos B5B,859, 870 and 871 of} Kolanpakum Village,^{Alleru [,4andal, Yadadri-Bhongir District pending disposalof the} main Writ Petition,

¶32

Counsel for the Petitioner:^{SRl. CHANDRASENLAW OFFICES}

¶33

Counsel for the^{RespondentNos.1to 5: GPFOR REVENUE}

¶34

Counsel for the Respondent^{Nos.6to 13: NONEAPPEARED}

¶35

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶36

-THE HON'BLE SRI.IIISTICE T. A}IARNATH COUD

¶37

ORDER:

¶38

WRIT PETITION No.t l5B0 of 2021

¶39

This writ petition is filed seeking to direct the 2,,d respondent to consider the representation of petitioners dated 16.07.2020 with regard to assignment of lands to non-rocals and to alrot such lands to the locar residents like the petitioners, and also direct the unofficiar responcrents not to enter into any sale transactions to create third party rights over the assigned lands. with a hrrtlrer direction to the 5tl,respondent not to register an.v docurnent with regard to the Government lanti a otted to thc unofficial respondents.

¶40

lleard hoth s iclcs.

¶41

During thc course ol'hearing. Iearnecl counscl lirr pctitioners has submittctl that thc 2"'l responclcrr t- District Collector bc dircctcd to disposc of the rcpresentation of the petitioners. dated 16.07.2020. lor Lvhich. the learned Governnrcnt Pleader seeks lor srant o1'some time.

¶42

In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 2''d respondent to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 16.07 -2020 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of three months irom the date of receipt ol a copy of this order. No rlrder as to costs.

¶43

I'cnding n.risccllancorrs applications. il trnr. shall sltttrtl^clrlsc:cl

¶44

SD/. I.NAGALAKSHMI //TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRARq" SECTION OFFICER

¶45

To,

¶46

The District Collector, Yadadri-Bhonqir^{District. Bhongir'} 2. One CC to Sri Chandrasen Law^{Offices, Advocate} IOPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP for Revenue,^{High Courtfor the State of Telanganaat} Hyderabad. [OUT] 4, Two CD Copies

CHR

HIGH COURT

DATED:0210612021

ORDER

W.P.No.11580 ot 2021

,^? 1 Hk- sTA IC: oi<br>o,J 1 1 i'dti 20?1
:,,t t.-,,, -..'it -':'
--=- :;;-

¶54

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶55

L
w4

Smt. Miryala Sunitha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Miryala Sunitha v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s. Jetti Agri Science (Opc) Private Limited Vs The State of Telangana and another

Shri Ram General Insurance Company Limited Vs Yenkola Raju , Prasa Raju and Another

Shriram General Insurance Company Limited, Vs P.Renamma

Butti Sharada Vs The State of Telangana

D.Pochaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Devalamkadi Beesi Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others