Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging permission granted to erect a cell tower. Court found the petition lacked a cause and dismissed it as infructuous at the behest of the lawyer.
None; writ petition dismissed as infructuous without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITION NO: 7280 OF 2018
Between:
Suvarna Valley Welfare Associalion Society,, Ameenpur (V), Sangareddy (Dt.), Telangana.Rep. by its President K. Sandeep Kumar Reddy,S/o K. Laxma Reddy, aged about 36years, Occ. Software Engineer, R/o Plot No.1 87, RTC Colony. Near H lr,4T Colony, Ameenpur l,4andal,Sangareddy(Dt. ), Telangana - 502032.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue, a writ of [Vlandamus, declaring the action of the respondent Nos.2 to 4 granting the permission to 5th respondent to erect the cell tower on PRIYA RESIDENCY, RTC Suvarna Valley Colony, RTC Colony, Ameenpur lr/andal, Sangareddy District, Telangana as illegal, improper, un.just, arbitrary and contrary to guidelines.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not. to proceed with the erection of the cell tower on PRIYA RESIDENCY, RTC Suvarna Valley Colony, RTC Colony, Ameenpur l,4andal, Sangareddy District, Telangana pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: GP FOR INFORMATION & TECHNOLOGY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: SRl. G. NARENDER REDDY, SC FOR ZPP,MPP,GPP
Counsel forthe Respondent No. 5: SRl. P. HEMA CHANDRA
The Court made the following:
I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ?.AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITIO N NO.7280 0F 2018
ORDER:
It is represented by the Learned counsel for the petitioner that he received instructions from the petitioner that the cause for which he filed the present writ petition does not survive and therefore, requested to dismiss the writ petition.
Recording the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel,
the miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall stand closed.
SD/.K.ONESIM ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// &
SECTION OFFICER
To,
I
HIGH COURT
DATED:15/06/2021
ORDER
WP.No.7280 of 2018
-i HE S l-4 r€
q )e 26 JtjNzo2l
o2.
*
:1,
Dismissing the WP As infructuous Without costs.
b'
15
A$)'
Suvarna Valley Welfare Association Society
State of Telangana
District Collector, Sangareddy
Tahsildar (MRO), Patancheru Mandal
Ameenpur GramPanchayat
Reliance JIO Infocomm Limited
Justice T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
