Petitioners challenged the installation of a mobile tower at Police Station Quarters violating Article 21. The Court found interim orders dated 28.02.2018 sufficient and disposed of the petition accordingly.
Writ petition disposed of in terms of interim orders dated 28.02.2018; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD
WRIT PETITION NO: 6366 OF 2018
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filedtherewith, the HighCourt may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction,particularly one in the nature ofWrit of Mandamus' declaring the action of the respondents inproceedingto installthe mobile tower at the top of Police Station Quarters in Santhinagar, Choutuppalvillageas illegal,arbitrary and violation of Article 21 of the Constituting of lndia andconsequentlydirectthe respondents not to proceed with the installation of RelianceJio tVobile Towerat Police Station Quarters, Shantinagar, ChoutuppalVillage ofyadadri Bhuvanagiri District.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay be pleased to grant stay of process of installation of Reliance Jio,4G mobile tower at Police Station Quarters, Shantinagar, Choutuppal Village ofyadadri BhuvanagiriDistrict, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioners:SRl. N NANDAKISHORE
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: GPFOR PANCHAYAT RAJ& RURAL DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Respondent No. 3: GPFOR HOME
Counsel for the Respondent No. 4: SRl. G.NARENDER REDDY, SC FOR GRAMPANCHAYAT
Counsel for the Respondent No. 2: NONEAPPEARED The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOU[)
WRIT PETITION No.6366 of 2018
ORDER:
When the mauer is taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for petitioners that in view of the interim orders dated 28.02.2018, directing the unofficial respondents i.e. Reliance Jio lllbcom Limited not to erect any Cell Tower upon the police Station :rrilding, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition.
Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the
interinr orders dated 28.02.2018. No order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any. shall stand closed
SD/-K.ONESIM ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// G,
\
SECTION OFFICER
To,
PM
HIGHCOURT
DATED:15/06/2021
ORDER
WP.No.6366 of2018
1 H e S 1a
a
s' 2 I Jufl2on
*
D I'iTC
Disposing of the WP Without costs.
?D\4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition under Article 226 requiring a stay on mobile tower installation requires fresh intervention given existing interim orders.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Bungamatla Ravi
B. Jangaiah
State of Telangana
Reliance Jio Infocom Limited
Commissioner of Police, Rachakonda
Grampanchayat, Choutuppal
T. Amarnath Goud
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
