Disposed

Hasan Ali Nizami v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC20 Sept 2021WP/5308/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition was disposed of at the admission stage. The High Court declined to adjudicate merits and directed the petitioner to file an application via the Dharani Portal within two weeks. The authorities are given two months to pass orders.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to file an application through the Dharani Portal within two weeks; authorities to decide within eight weeks.

Hasan Ali Nizami Vs The State of Telangana — Writ and Judicial Review | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

MONDAY ,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO: 5308 OF 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

Hasan Ali Nizami, S/o Osman Ali Nizami Aged. 62 years, Occ. Business H. No-'10-5-310/1 , First Lancer, Syed Nagar Colony, Asif Nagar, Hyderabad- 500 028.

¶8

.,.PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Telangana Secretariat, BRKRV Bhavan, Hyderabad.

¶11

The District Collector, Vikarabad, Vikarabad District.

¶12

The Tahasildar, lvlarpally, Marpally Mandal, Vikarabad District.

¶13

4, The Station House Officer, PS Marpally, Vikarabad District

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^{High Court may be pleased} to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more^{particularly one in the nature of} Writ of Mandamus by declaring the inaction of the 3rd respondentⁱⁿ altering^the wrong entries made by him in the Adangal Pahani column as^{per the letter issued} by the 2nd respondent as illegal u n constitutio nal and consequently^{directthe 3rd} Respondent to dispose off the Representation dated 2811012020 seeking to^make proper entries by showing Petitioner name in the cultivation column of Adangal Pahani and issue Patta book/Pass Book/ Pahani with respect to Sy.No.43 in Patloor Village, Marpally [t/andal.

¶16

lA NO: 1 F 2021

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the High Court^{may be pleasedto direct} the 3rd Respondent to dispose off the Representation Dt.06.02.2020^and 28.10.2020 of the Petitioner.

¶18

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶19

Between:

¶20

Mohd. Sarwar Ali S/o. Mohammed Sadath Ali about 49^{years Occ: Business,Fl/o.} H.No.5-2-2019, Sai Krupa Nagar,Opp. lslamic Centre, Sangareddy^{Mandal and District}

¶21

...Petitioner/Proposed Respondent No.5

¶22

AND

¶23

Hasan Ali Nizami, S/o Osman Ali Nizami Aged. 62^years, Occ. Business H. No-10-5-310/1, First Lancer, Syed Nagar Colony, Asif Nagar, Hyderabad- 500 028.

¶24

....RespondenUWrit Petitioner

¶25

The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary,^{Revenue Department,} Telangana Secretariat, BRKRV Bhavan, Hyderabad.

¶26

The District Collector, Vikarabad, Vikarabad District.

¶27

The Tahasildar, Marpally, Marpally Mandal, Vikarabad District.

¶28

The Station House Officer, PS Marpally, Vikarabad District

¶29

,..Respondents/Respondents

¶30

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the petitioner as proposed respondent no. 5 in the above Writ petition No. 5308 of 2021 as well as lA's.

¶31

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI S. KRISHNA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: GP FOR HOME Counsel forthe Proposed Respondent No.5: SRI B. RAJU

¶32

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶33

]'HE IIO'BLE SI{t JUSTICE A..\BTIISHEK IIEDDY

¶34

\'RIT PETI'l'lON No.5308 of 2021

¶35

ORDIiR:

¶36

I-leard the learned counsel tbr the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader lor Revenue lor respondent Nos.l to 3.^With their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage.

¶37

Aggrieved by the action of respondent No.3 in altering^the wrong entries in the Adangal Pahani Column^{as per the letter issued} by respondent No.2, despite tlie^{petitionerfiled a representation,dated} 28.10.2020, seeking to make proper entries with^respect to^Survey No.43 situated at Patloor Village, Marpally Mandal,^{the present writ} petition is illed.

¶38

Learned Covemrneut Pleader states that if the^{petitionerfiles an} application through on-line in^{Dharani Portal,the same will be} considered and rrecessary orders will^{be passedby the authorities} concerned, in accordance^withlaw

¶39

Having regard to the above made submissions,^{without going} into the merits or demerits of the case,^{the Writ Petitionis disposed of} directing the petitioner to file an^{application throughon-linein} Dharani Portal, ventilating his^{grievance, within a period of two} weeks frorn the date of receipt of a copy of^{this order. On such} application being filed, the authorities^{concemedshall pass necessary} orders thereon, strictly in^{accordancewith law, as expeditiouslyas} possible, preferably, within a peliod of eight^{weeks thereof, duly}

¶40

putting all the interested parties on notice and considering the

¶41

objections, if any. A copy of the order that may be passed by the respondent authorities shall be communicated to the petirioner.

¶42

Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶43

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶44

Sd,,.T.KRISHNA^KUMAR ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR

\t_--

//TRUE^COPY//

SECTION^OFFICER

u nn n u To' I Thc Princioal Secret€ " '" l H1$rilffiH,N!,#,N1,;qfi[1!::: u'u' , ?H'33'3ftJ?"',',i"'",^{Hish court ror the State or relansana} at Hvderabad [OUTI a. 6ri"'cciJSri^{b. n"ir, Advocate[oPUc]}

¶50

Two^{CD CoPies} 10.One SPare^CoPY sm

(lr-

HIGH COURT

DArED:2010912021

OROER

WP.No.5308 of 2021

S T I €
I
I e
2 S stPt021
oo .t)7c
i
t
D

¶57

DISPOSING OF THE WP AT THE STAGE OF ADMISSION WITHOUT COSTS

Hasan Ali Nizami v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hasan Ali Nizami v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P. Ramesh Goud, Vs The Joint Collector

Sadashiv Sawrikar Vs v.Naresh

Sri Vittal Patel Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Khaja Mahmooduddin Vs The State of Telangana, And 3 Others

Nayaki Seetharamulu, And 2 Others Vs The State of Telangana, And 9 Others

T. Venkat Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 5 others