The High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as withdrawn by the counsel appearing for the petitioners without costs.
Permission granted for withdrawal of writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION N o. 189 0F 2012
Between:
Both R/o. Patelguda Village, Patancheru lr,4andal, lvledak District
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of Indiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the impugned orderpassed by the'1strespondent dt. 13.7.2011 in No. F3l2308/2008-F3/15/ROR/08 confirming the orderspassed by the 3'd respondent in File No.8/280/2008 dl. 25.1.2008 as being illegal and arbitrary and consequently set aside the same.
l
WPM P. NO: 249 OF 2012
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order passed by the 1sr respondent dt. 13.2.2011 in No. F31230812008-F3/1 s/RoR/08 confirming the orders passed by the 3'd respondent in File No. B128012008 dt. 25.'1 .2008, pending disposat of the main Writ petition. WVMP. NO:4575 OF 2012
Between:
..,.PET|T|oNERS/RESPONDENTS
AND
...RESPONDENTS/WRIT PETITIONERS
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may ber pleased to vacate the order daled 17.02.2012 made in W.P.M.P.No.249 of 2012 in W.p.No.189 of 2012.
WVMP. NO: 4576 OF 2 012
Between:
Hanumanth Rao, S/o Papaiah, Patancheru Village and Mandal, Medak District.
...PETITIONERS/RESpONDENT No.4
J
AND
....RESPONDENTSM/RIT PETITIONERS
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthat in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order d1.17-2-2012 madein W.P.M.P.No.249 of 2012 in W.P.No.1Bgof 2012and dismiss the writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitigners: SRIMANDA ADAM
Counsel for the RespondentNos.1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the RespondentNos' 4 to 14:. SRI P. VENKAT REDDY
Gounsel for the ResPondentNo.15: -
The Court made the following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION No. 789 of 201.2
ORDER:
Sri M. Adam, the leamed counsel for the petitioners, has addressed letter dated 13.09.2021to the Registry seeking withdrawal the writ petition.
Permission is granted and the writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order dated 1.7.02.2012 shall stand vacated.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand
dismissed. No order as to costs.
SD/. N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (io
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, a1 One CC to Sri Manda Adam, Advocate [OPUC] Two ccs to GP for Revenue, Higrr court for the state of rerangana at Hvderabad. tOUTI 3 th" 99to Sri P. Venkar Reddy,Advocate [OPUC] 4 Two CD Copies. A One Spare Copy. ltlP
t$k
5
HIGHCOURT
DATED:1710912021
ORDER
WP.No.189 ot 2012
( IA
q
ot) 05 0sl202l .\C)
-l
,(aS
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
P.Ramesh Goud
P.Satish Goud
Hanumanth Rao
D. Prabavathi
P. Vittal Reddy
G. Narayana
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
