Disposed

T. Venkat Reddy v. The State of Telangana and 5 others

Telangana HC20 Sept 2021WP/11305/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage. Instead of adjudicating merits, the Court directed the petitioner to file an application regarding correction of revenue record entries through the Dharani Portal within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to file an application for correction of revenue entries through Dharani Portal within two weeks; authorities ordered to pass appropriate orders.

T. Venkat Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 5 others — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF^{TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD} (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

IUONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF SEPTETMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶5

wRtT PET|TION NO. 11305 0F 2021

¶6

. Between:

¶7

T, Venkat Reddy, S/o T. Ranga Reddy, Aged about 56 yrs., Occ. Agriculture, R/o Bonthugutta Village, T.K. Tanda, Gram Panchayat, Miryalaguda Mandal, Nalgonda District.

¶8

...PETITIONER

¶9

AND

¶10

1 The State of Telangana, Rep. by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, BRK Bhavan, Hyderabad

¶11

2 District Collector, Mirayalaguda lVandal, Nalgonda District, Telangana. 3 Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO), Miryalaguda Mandal, Nalgonda District. 4 Tahisildar, Joint Sub-Registiar, IViirala1juda-Mandal, Nalgond"a District. 5 T. Rajasekhar Reddy 5/o T. RangiReddy, R/o. 3-9"-281, Saraswathi Naqar, Saroor Nagar lVlandal, Chintal Kunta, Ranga Reddy District.

¶12

6 V.angala Nare-nder Reddy, S/o Chalapathf Reddy, R/o. 19-105/, Nagarjuna Hills, lr/iryalaguda. Miryalaguda Mandal, Nalgonda Disirict.

¶13

(R5 CT & lA 112021 prayer is amended as per C.O. dt. 1411212021 in lA.No. 212021 ,)

¶14

...RESPONDENTS

¶15

Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an order or orders or writ more particularly in the nature of writ of [Vlandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not adjudicating the application filled by the Petitioner daled 2.3.2021 as the same is illegal, arbitrary and un.iust consequenfly direct the respondent to pass appropriate order in view of the application filed by the Petitioner dated 2.3.2021 .

¶16

lA NO:¹ OF 2021

¶17

Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affjdavjt filed in supporl of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 4th responded not to register the land to an extent of 6.5 gts in Sy.No. 394t1t6, Sy.No. 384/3519, 3841113 of Chintapalty Village, IVirayalaguda Mandal, Natgonda District which belongs to the Petitioner.

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. RAVI MOHAN

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: Gp FOR REVENUE

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent No.s: Mr. SADIe HUSSAIN

¶21

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶22

TIIE HON'BLE^{SRt JUSTICE A.ABITISTIEK REDDY}

¶23

WRIT PETI TION^{No.ll J05 of 2021}

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

Heard the learned^{counsel for the petitioner,the learned} Government^{Pleader for Revenue for the official respondents and the} leamed counsel^{for respondentNo. 5. With their consent' the Writ} Petition is disposed^{of at the admissionstage'}

¶26

The main^{grievance of the petitioner is that the oillcial} respondents^{are not disposing of his application, dated 02'03'2021'} seeking^{correction of entriesin the revenuerecords and lor} cancellation^{of the Pass Books issued in fhvour of respondentNo. 5,} in respect of^{lancl to an extentof Ac' 3-25guntas'in Sy No' 384'} situated in^{ChintapallyVillage, MiryalagudaMandal' Nalgonda} District.

¶27

Learned Government^{Pleader states that il the petitioneruakes} an application^{through on-line in Dharani Portal ventilating his} grievance, the^{same will be consideredand necessaryorders will be} passed by the authorities^{concerned, in accordancewithlaw'}

¶28

Having^{regard to the above made submissions' withoutgoing} into the^{merits or demeritsof the case,the Writ Petitionis disposed ol} directing^{the petitioner to make an application ventilatinghis} grievance i.e.,^{for corection of entriesin the revenue records etc''} through^{on-line in Dharani Portal, withina periodof two weekstiom} the date of^{receipt of a copy of this order' On such applicationbeing} flled, the authorities^{concerned sha11pass necessaryorders thereon'}

¶29

¶30

strictly rn accordance with law, a.s expeditrousiy AS possible, preferably, within a period of eight weeks thereof duly puuing ail the interested parties on notice, including the unofficial respondents herein and considering the objections, if any.

¶31

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

¶32

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶33

SD/-T.KRISHNA KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶34

Note: Typographical Error Occurredⁱⁿ the Cause^title as Respondent No. 5 name is corrected^{not as} " T. Rajasekhar Reddy S/o, T. Ranga Reddy lnstead of T, Ranga Reddy S/o. Venkat^{Reddy" and} lhe Survey Number is also corrected^{as Sy.No.3841116'} Sy.No. 384/35/9,3841113^{lnsteadof Sy.No' 384} ai^per the Corut Order^{daled14.12.2021passed} in in.No. 2 ot 2021^{as per the Ordersof Hon'ble} Court dated 14j22021^{made in I A,No 2 ol 2021in} W.P.No.1 1305^{o'f 2021 .}

¶35

This Amended^{Order shall substitutethe} earlier order^{which has already been dispatchedon} 30.09.2021.

¶36

//TRUE COPY//

¶37

Sd/. PABADMANABHA^REDDY ASSISTANT^REGISTRAR [t"

¶38

SECTION OFFICER

¶39

to',. ,n" Principal Secretary' Revenue Department' State of Telangana' Secretariat' ? ?fffiS,?[?t{'9t!ii,t'fii',varasrdar/and,r,^{f?lffim,?I,'ji]',li,TiiXtTBt,.lo} 5. iii;^{"R;;;te -oivisio i Jr oft icei(RDo)'N/irvalgsl} 4. rhe rahisildur.,^{.loint'sl#d;s:;i;;;-tt/idtd[9{tlanoat Nalsonda District'} ;. o;; cc*m-sii'c.^{nuvitvlohaiAdvocate[pPuct} 6.TwoCCstocptJi.,ii.Gii;;,-HigiibourtiorthestateofTelanganaat z oill"ctiJ Hvderabad.^Hii [OUT]^{-sr'oiq Hussain' Advocate (oPUC)}

B. Two^{CD CoPies}

9, One^{SPare CoPY'}

MP r'

HIGH COURT

DATED:2010912021 1411212021

¶45

AMENDED ORDER

¶46

WP.No.11305 ot 2021

¶47

i' 1 i:
4 * !l!
a
=$
o '.a'8 rl
s'd. c
c-
\rl'.
:\ .t*rr'

¶48

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶49

\
c))

T. Venkat Reddy v. The State of Telangana and 5 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T. Venkat Reddy v. The State of Telangana and 5 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P. Ramesh Goud, Vs The Joint Collector

Sadashiv Sawrikar Vs v.Naresh

Sri Vittal Patel Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Khaja Mahmooduddin Vs The State of Telangana, And 3 Others

Hasan Ali Nizami Vs The State of Telangana

Nayaki Seetharamulu, And 2 Others Vs The State of Telangana, And 9 Others