Permitting the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition challenging the Enquiry Notice, the High Court dismissed the writ as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiclion)
FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
wRtT PET|TTON NO.21063 0F 2021
Betw ee n :
Sri Vittal Patel, S/o. Valji Patel, Aged about 45years, Occ.lv4/s CNL AgriTech, Rep. by ils Partner Pochampally Village and Mandal, Yadadri Bhuvanagiri District (otd Nalgonda District), TS.
...pETt,oNER
AND
1 The State of Telangana, Rep by its Prl. Secretary, Depaftmentof Environment, Forest, Science and Technology, Secretariat, Hyderabad, TS. 2 The District Forest Officer, O/o. District Forest Officer, tudrdt'.t[[r6NStlbJ,i+,
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution oflndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHighCourt may be pleased to issue a writ or order moreparticularly one in the nature ofWrit of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order(a). Quash/ Set aside the Enquiry Notice of the 2nd respondent vide Rc No.1032/2019/S3dated1'1-06-2019 (servedon the petitioner on 30/08/2021) as illegal, void and arbitrary against the Article 21 ofthe Constitution of lndia, rule 3 of TelanganaForest Offences (Compoundingand Prosecution) Rules, 1969 and Telangana WoodBased lndustries (Regulation)Rules' 201 6
lA NO: 1 OF 2021
Pelition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit fited in support of thepetition, the High Courtmay be pleasedto suspend the Enquiry notice of the 2nd respondent vide RcNo.1032/2019/S3dated 1110612019 (served on the petitioner on 30/08/2021).
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMESH VISHWANATHULA& SRI NASARAIAH GOLLA
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR FORESTS
The Court made the following: ORDER
rljI I'ION'BLh SIU JUSTTCE A.AtsHISHU( ItEDr)y
oI(DI,R:
lyR.ll_t'L'rITI ON No. 21 06
Learnecl counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this
Court to withclraw tlte writ petition.
Permission is accor<leci.
Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissecl as withcirawn.
The miscellaneous petitions pendin& if any, shall stand
closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/.K.VENKAIAH
ASSIS;TANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,'1, One CC to Sri Ramesh Vishwanathula & Sri Nasaraiah Golla, Advocates [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP for Forests, High Court for the State of Telangana atHyderabad. touTl
MP NS
+^
HIGH COURT
DATED:1710912021
ORDER
L 5 I€
1 o
( ar<br>'q
I f,
2021
STP
(J II
r/r- li
* i
1
WP.No.21063 of 2021
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
a.l l'
..)
<br>
Vittal Patel
The State of Telangana
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
