Disposed

Khaja Mahmooduddin v. The State of Telangana, And 3 Others

Telangana HC20 Sept 2021WP/2138/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition filed for mutation of land records in Telangana. Disposed of at admission stage directing petitioner to file application via Dharani Portal within two weeks for authorities to decide within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to file application through online Dharani Portal within two weeks; authorities to pass orders within eight weeks.

Khaja Mahmooduddin Vs The State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD} (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

IVONDAY, THE TWENTIETH^{DAY OF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND^TWENTYONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE^{A.ABHISHEKREDDY}

¶5

WRIT PETITION N o. 2138 0F 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

Khaia Mahmooduddin, S/o.^{Late Khaja Mohiuddin,} -Age^{72..years. Occ'} nij"trrt,ji", ny" b.no i-t-+to,^{Thousand'Piller Temple,Raipura, Hanamkonda'} Warangal District. ...'ETIT'ONER AND 1 The State of Telangana,^{Repby its Princlpal Secretary, Revenue Department'} Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2 The District Collector,^{Mulugu District} 3 The Revenue Divisional Officer,^{Mulugu, Mulugu Dlstrlct'} 4 The Tahsildar, Venkarapur^{tr/andal, Mulugu District'} ResoondentNos.2to4CauseTitleisamendedasperCourtorderdated 20 Og.2O21 in LA.No^{2 of} 2021

¶8

...'ETIT'ONER

¶9

...RES'ONDENTS

¶10

Petition under^{Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the} circumstances stated^{in the affidavitfiled therewith, the HighCourt may be pleasedto} issue an appropriate^{Writ, order or Direction, more particularlyone in the nature of} writ of Mandamus^{declaring the inaction of the respondents in mutatingthe nameof} petitionerinrespectoflandadmeasuringinSyno253/2foranextentofAC29.08 Guntas, Sy^{no 254 for an extent of AC '1 5.34 Guntas and Sy no 255 for an extentof} 14'38guntaSatVenkatapurRevenueVillage,VenkatapurMandal,Jaisankar Bhupalpally District^{as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 21 and 300A of} the constitution of^{lndia and consequently direct the respondentsto mutatethe name} of the^{petitionerin respectof land admeasuringin Sy no 253/2 for an extentof AC} 2g.0BGuntas,Syno254foranextentofACl5'34GuntasandSyno255foran extent of 14.38^{guntas at Venkatapur} Revenue Village,^{VenkatapurMandal,} Jaisankar BhuPalPallY^District.

¶11

lA NO: 1 oF 2021

¶12

Petition under Section^{151CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the} affidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition,theHighCourtmaybepleasedtodirectto mutatethenameofthePetitionerinSyno25312foranextentofAC29.08Guntas, Syno254foranextentofACl5.34GuntasandSyno255foranextentofl4.38 guntasatVenkatapurRevenueVillage,VenkatapurMandal,JaisankarBhupalpally District^{pendingdisposal of the abovewrit petition'}

¶13

Counsel for the^{Petitioner:SRI V. T. KALYAN} Counsel for the^{Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE}

¶14

The Court made^{the following:ORDER}

¶15

THE HON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICEA.ABHISHEKREDDY}

¶16

WRIT PETITION^{No. 2138of 2021}

¶17

ORDBR:

¶18

Heard the^{leamed counselfor the petitioner and the learned} Govemment^{Pleaderfor Revenuelor the respondentsWith their} consentr the^{Writ Petitionis disposedof at the admissionstage'}

¶19

Aggrieved by^{the inaction of the respondentsin mutating the} name of the^{petitionerin respectof land in SurveyNo'253/2to an} extent of Ac.29.08^{guntas, in Survey No'254 to an extentof Ac' 1 5 '34} guntas and in Survey^{No'255 to an extent of 14'38 guntas, situatedat} Venkatapur Revenue^{Vitlage, VenkatapurMandal'Jaisankar} Bhupalpally District,^{the present writ petition is filed'}

¶20

Learned Government^{Pleaderstates that if the petitioner filesan} application through^{on-linein Dharani Portal,the same will be} considered and^{necessaryorders will be passedby the authorities} concerned, in accordance^withlaw.

¶21

l-Iaving regard^{to the above madesubmissions, ra'ithoutgoing} into the merits^{or demeritsof the case, the writ Petitionis disposed of} directing the^{petitionerto file an application throughon-linein} Dharani Portal,^{ventilatinghis grievance,within a period of two} weeks from the^{date of receipt of a copy of this order' On such} application being^{filed, the authorities concemedshall pass necessary} orders thereon,^{strictly in accordancewith law, as expeditiouslyas} possible, preferably,^{within a period of eightweeks thereof' duly}

¶22

putting all the interested parties on notice and considering the

¶23

objections, if any. A copy of the order that may be passed by the

¶24

respondent authorities shall be communicated to the petitioner.

¶25

Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶26

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶27

SD/-R.KARTHIKEYAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY'

¶28

SECTION OFFICER

¶29

To,

¶30

The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶31

The District Collector, Mulugu District.

¶32

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Mulugu, Mulugu District.

¶33

The Tahsildar, Venkatapur Mandal, Mulugu District.

¶34

One CC to Sri V. T. Kalyan, Advocate [OPUC]

¶35

Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

¶36

Two CD Copies. ,t+B. One Spare Copy.

HIGH COURT

DATED:2010912021

ORDER

1 6E $ IA r€:
q
o a
22 0$2021 .L
*
Dr.c. P

¶42

WP.No.2138 of²⁰²¹

¶43

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

Khaja Mahmooduddin v. The State of Telangana, And 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khaja Mahmooduddin v. The State of Telangana, And 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P. Ramesh Goud, Vs The Joint Collector

Sadashiv Sawrikar Vs v.Naresh

Sri Vittal Patel Vs The State of Telangana and Another

Hasan Ali Nizami Vs The State of Telangana

Nayaki Seetharamulu, And 2 Others Vs The State of Telangana, And 9 Others

T. Venkat Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 5 others