High Court closed Writ Petition No. 20507 of 2006 regarding regularization services without costs, as an interim order on 29.9.2006 deemed the matter disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 20507 OF 2006
Between:
Dr.V. Ramesh, s/o V.Jagannath Rao, Academic Consultant P.G.College of Science, Osmania University, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol lhe Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned action of the 2nd respondent university in dis-engaging the petitioner every year and subjecting them to repeated selections and further action of the respondent university in contemplating to disengage the petitioner and in not regularizing the services of the petitioners and further action of the respondent university in not conducting regular selection to the vacant post of Lectu re rs/Assrsta nt Professors in Osmania University inspite of availability of posts While considering and regularizing the similarly situated candidates as highly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Art.14 and 16 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents university to frame a scheme for regularization of the Part Time Lecturers/Academ ic Consultants as done in the case of others vide Proceedings No. MR-64l2l2003lAdm.lll dated 25-2-2006.
WPMP. NO: 25940 OF 2006
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as Academic consultant without breakup till regular appointments are made in the posts of Lecturers/Associate Professors pending disposal of the writ petition.
WPMP. NO:
219 0F 2010
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Courtnraybe pleased to amend the writpetition asfollows: Writ of mandamuSdeclaring the impugned action of the 2nd respondentin rejecting the caseof the petitiorrerfor paymentof salaries of a regular Assistant Professorvide Memo No. MR-30,1/132l2009/Adm.l- 1, dated 23-04-2010 ashighly illegaland arbitrary and further actionof the 2nd respondent in denying the equalpay tothe petitioner on par with those Academic Consultants / Part Time Lecturerswho have been extended with minimumscale of Lecturers asper the ordersof this Hon'ble Court in W.A. Nrl. 764 / 1999 and batch and also declare the action of the2nd respondent irt regularizing the service of various Academic Consultants /part timeLecturersvideProceedings No. MR-64/2/2003/Adm.lll, dated 25-02-2006andnot extendinil the same benefit in favour of thepetitioner as highly illegal, arbitraryand violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution of lndia.
WPMP. NO: 28220 OF 2010
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying thatin the cirt)umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court rnay be pleasedto direct the respondents topay the salaries tothe petitioneron par with other Academic Consultants / Part Time Lecturerswho have been prlid minimum scale of Lecturers asper the directions of this Hon'ble Courtin W.A llo.764 /1998 and batch without reference to the Memo No. MR-304/1 3212009lltdm.l-1,dated 23- 04-2010 and Addendum vide ProceedingsNo. MR-369/132l2C,09/Adm.l-1, dated 31-05-2010 issued by the 2nd respondent,pending disposalof .he writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. G V SHIVAJI
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1:GP FOR HIGHER EDUCAT ON
Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 & 3: M/S. G. JAYA REDDY
The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAYILI '
wRIT PETITION No.20507 of 2006
ORDER:
I . When the matter is taken up for hearing, leamed counsel for the petitioner has informed the Court that this Court was pleased to grant interim order on 29.9.2006 directing the respondents to continue the petitioner in service. He further contended that in view of the said interim order, no fur1her orders need to be passed in this writ petition. 2. ln view of the atbresaid submission made by the learned counsel, this Courl is of the considered view that in view of the interinr order passed by this Court on 29.9.2006, no further orders need to be passed in this writ petition
Sd/.V.SUDHA
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY'
SE oNo FICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DA,TED:1210812021
ORDER
WP.No.20507 of 2006
,t
1 74 r4,
4:
l
a)
o 13 sEPzon .La
rl
o
Closing the WP Without costs.
f
I
Dr. V. Ramesh
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Osmania University
The Principal, P.G.College of Science
Abhind Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
