A writ petition seeking removal of the petitioner's name from a rowdy sheet was dismissed as no case was made out because the rowdy sheet had already been closed vide orders dated 17-04-2014.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdietion)
WEDNESDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 10040 OF 2014
Betwee n:
Namburi Venkateswara Rao, S/o Subbaiah A/a. 39 years, Occ: Catering, Sri Sai Caterers, Fyo 13/0 3-1 1-382, Suryodaya Colony, L.B. Nagar.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the cjrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, to direct the respondent i.e., SHO, LB Nagar, Cyberabad, RR District, to remove the name of the petitioner from the rowdy sheeters list as the petitioner is leading his life in a peaceful atmosphere by doing catering works and consequen y d irect the respondents.
WPMP. NO: 12598 OF 2014
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased direct the respo6dent i.e., SHO, L.B. Nagar, Cyberabad, RR District not to summon the petitioner to Police Station pending disposal of the above writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. RAJAGOPALLAVAN TAyt
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME
The Court made the following:
(
il0'rlt_1._ stU.,t st't(-l: AIIHt.-\t) Kt ]t.\R SHAVtt.t
\'.1).\o. I 00J0 ol' 201 l
olU) t. tt:
\ ltcn llte nlitltet. is Lril(cn LlIt lirr Itcuring. lclir.n,-,ri eorrrrscl lirr. tltc l)ctiIir).dlIrLrl contcnriccl thlt thc pctitioncr has lllcc] tlre pr.c-sent \,rit l)ctirio. challcrgi.g the action ol'thc responclents in ,ot closinir tirc rr)utir sltcet against tIc" petitio.er.
Learned Govemment pleader for Home, appt:aring for the respondents, has contended that the rowdy sheet opened against the pctitioner was closed vide orders dt.l7-04-2014.
l{cc.r'cli.g thc saicr surrrnission. this corrt is or- rhe consicrtr.ecr r ie ir thet tlre e ,Lrsc i, tlre \'r'it l)ctiti., rlocs r.rot sLrr.r ir c Accordinulr,. llrc \ r'it I)ctrtit'n is elo:cci. \o crlsts.
\Iisccllaneous pctitions penriing, il'any, shall stan(i closed.
SD/.T.KRISHNA KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
,TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
'1 . One CC to Sri. Rajagopallavan Tayi, Advocate TOPUCI 2. Two CCs to GP for Home ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 3. Two CD Copies.
I- ,L,/
PME
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 1/08i202'l
ORDER
WP.No.10040 of 20'14
.rE STAI
6
/qo) ?
1 I s'"'P ?021
-ri
\vgY
Closing the WP Without costs.
/b,q , (
t
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ of mandamus is maintainable to remove a petitioner's name from a rowdy sheet when the rowdy sheet has already been closed by an order dated 17-04-2014.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Namburi Venkateswara Rao
Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
