Sirajuddin, Nizamabad v. N.P.D.C.L., and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Plain order dismissing a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear and submit representation.
Plain order dismissing a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear and submit representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMARSHAVILI
wRrr PET|T|ON NO. 202'16 0F 2008
Between:
Siraiuddin. S/o. Pasha lr/ohiuddin,aged about 42 years'R/o H. No.9-20-'1 899, Near Gousia lt4osque,Auto Nagar, Nizamabad. ,..PETITIONER
AND
Petition underArticle226 of the constitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances statedin the affidavitfiled therewith,the High court may be pleased to issue a writ,orderor direction especiallyone in the nature of writ of Mandamus: i. declare the actionof the respondentsin rejecting petitioner'scase for being appointed as LDCasillegal and arbitrary and sela-side theletter No.CGM(HRD)/GM(lR&LyAS-(L/PO-H-3AIVPNo'7037 of 2005-08 dt18'02'2008 issuedbythe2ndrespondent.ii.consequentlydirecttherespondentstoappointthe petitioners LDC, dulygranting all other consequential benefits'
Counsel for thePetitioner:SRI K. VASUDEVA REDDY (NoT PRESENT)
Counsel for theRespondent Nos. 1 to 3: SRI ZAKIR ALI DANISH'
S.C. FOR T.S.N.P.D.C.L.
Counsel forthe ResPondent No.4: -
The Court madethe following:ORDER
HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SFIAVILI
W.P.No.20216 OF 2008
ORDER:
On 02.09.2021, none appeared and there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Flence,, the matter rvas directed to be listed under the caption,,for dismissal,,. Today also, rvhen the matter is taken up for hearing, none appears and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioncr. I t appears that the petirione r is no r interested in prosecuting the matter.
Hence, the Writ Petition is disnrissed for
non-prosec Llti on. No costs,
Miscellaneous peritions, if any, pending shall stand
closed.
SD/. K.ONESIM ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To, '1. One C C to Sri K. Vasudeva Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One C C 1!l Sri Zakir Ali Danish, S.'C. for T.S. N.p.D.C.L. tOpUCl 3. Two C D Copies. 4. One S pare Copy. IVP
HIGHCOURT
DATED:0910912021
1$ g SrAI€ o
.t
oo 2g sEP2021 ):
<.
t
* O,:q:) f i:
ORDER
WP.No.20216 of 2008
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
Siraiuddin
Northern Power Distribution Company of AP Ltd.
Abhinand Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court