The Writ Petition was dismissed for default. None of the petitioners appeared on behalf when the case was listed for dismissal. The Court offered no further order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
I
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OFSEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 23224OF 2013
Between:
AND
Relation to Fee Fixation in Private Un-aided Professional Colleges, 1" Floor, (South Wing) Gagan Vihar, lvlJ Road, Hyd-1., Repted by its Member Secretary.
3, Andhra Pradesh State Council for Higher Education, Represented by its Commissioner & Director BRK Bhavan, Tank Bund, Hyderabad.
Respondents.
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith,the High court may be pleasedto issue a Writ, Order, Direction, one moreparticularlyin the natureof a Writ of "Mandamus" declaring the action of Respondents in notincludingthe second petitioner lnstitution in the Iist of Post Graduate Engineeringcollages in G.O. Ms.No.66 dated 30-7-2013 andin not notifying a fee of Rs.48,500/-for Post Graduate 1r,4. Tech courseper year per studentto the 2nd petitioner institution as illegal, arbitrary and u nco nstitutionaland further directthe Respondents No.1 & 2 to forthwith notify a fee of Rs. 48,500/-for Post GraduateM. Tech course per year per studentto the 2ndpetitioner institutionfor the academicyear 2013-2014 and further periodin the current blockperiod.
/
WPMP. NO: 28527 OF 2013
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to directthe Respondents herein the forthwith fix and notify a fee of Rs.48,500/- to the 2nd petitioner institution for Post Graduate M. Tech course per year per student and inform the same for all purposes including in the proposed PGEC/PGECET-2013 notification and information to the students while making admissions to the 2nd petitioner institution, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRl. SARWAR MD. (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 & 3: SRI C. SUDESH ANAND Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT PETITION No.23224 of 2013
OITDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, none appeared on behalf ol'petitioners, in spite of the fact that the writ petition is listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.'fherefore, this Court has no other
option except to dismiss the writ petition for default.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No
order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/.I.NAGALAKSHMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ,I,\ - SECTION O}.FICER
To,
- One CC to Sri Sarwar Md. Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri C. Sudesh Anand, Advocate [OPUC]
Two CCs tC 9.PlSr Higher Education, High Court fbr the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies 5. One Spare Copy CHR
HlGH COURT
DATED:0810912021
ORDER
W.P.No.23224 of 2013
t
. ..e c i']F
o,
<br>a
i Bn s"Pzotl .b
,,
\ C.i
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS,
n*'
oi
,gl Dl
ID
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed in default of appearance.
Planning, Coordination & Monitoring Board for Minorities (PCMB)
Shadan College of Engineering and Technology
Admission & Fee Regulatory Committee
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Andhra Pradesh State Council for Higher Education
Convenor Admissions
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
