Dismissed

Satyanarayana Reddy Gaddam v. The Government of India

Telangana HC8 Sept 2021WP/4017/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition challenging the exclusion of the petitioner from an LPG distributionship lottery conducted by Indian Oil Corporation, the High Court of Telangana permitted the withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh one if necessary. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn without costs.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition if necessary, subject to subsequent proceedings.

Satyanarayana Reddy Gaddam Vs The… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR^{THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD} (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

WEDNESDAY,^{THE EIGHTHDAYOF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND^ANDTWENTYONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE^{SRIJUSTICEABHINANDKUMAR SHAVILI}

¶5

WRIT PETI^{TtoNNO.401 7 0F 2019}

¶6

Between:

¶7

Satvanaravana^{Reddy Gaddam,S/o.G NarasimhaReddvaoedabout 53 years'} 6H"";;:i;;;;'-Rd^{b;";;;ipii' virtis" Jnd Manciar'-JaneoanDistrict'} Telangana State^{- 506302} ..'ET,T'ONER

¶8

AND 1. The Government^{of lndia, Rep. by its Secretary' Ministry of Petroliam and Natural} Gas. New Delhi.

¶9

1. itiJ i;;;;oii Corporation^{Limited' Rep'bv its ManagingDirector' lndian oil} Corooration Ltd.. New Delhi. _imited, 3-6_436^{to 438,ll}

¶10

J. iXl,"E*".ijii*"oi i".toi t^lpo ),^{I nd ian oil corporatio n I} ui i rrr Fri,oi,^{NJspurHolse,I'iimayathnagar,Hyderabad}

¶11

1. The c'"ip"","i[]j'Li,i[I,i, Deoutv General^{I o-+io N'lu"rg"r, i" 4iB: 'iLpc-is),' ll Floor, Naspur lnoaneArea House' office' Himavathnasar'lndianoil} Hvderabad.

¶12

1. iiiirl"'t)".irt^{Reddv,S/o. RamachnadraReddy:-Aged about 59. vears'occ} FiriJrt"Eriiov"e,^{Hio.n"sr,iriyJ 5*aya.Seva(Sansh,ro.l?REtroDENrs}

¶13

Petition under^{Article226 oI the Constitution of lndia praying that in the} circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith'theHighCourtmaybepleasedto issueappropriateorderordirectiononeinthenatureofWritofMandamusbyaction of the 2nd^{respondent in excluding the petitioner in the drawconducted on} 21-12-2018^{for grant of LPG Distributionship of lndian Oil Corporationat} Kamareddygudem/^{Devaruppula Grampanchayats' DevaruppulaMandal Jangaon} District,inpurSuanceofthe2ndnotificationDt.3o.0g-2olsinSpiteofthepetitioner submittinghisapplicationwithinthestipulatedtimeandbeingfullyeligibleasperthe saidnotification,asillegalarbitraryandavoidabinitiobesidesviolativeofdue procedures of law and^{principlesof natural justice' and consequently directthe 2nd} respondenttoconductthere-draw/lotterybyincludingthenameofthepetitioner' IA NO: 1 0F^20',19

¶14

Petition under Section^{151 CPC prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the} affidavit filed^{in supportof the petition,the High Court maybe pleased to directthe} gild respondent to conduct^{the re-draw i lottery by includingthe name of the petitioner} rn pursuance^{of the2nd notification 30-09-2018for grant of LPG Distributionship of} lndianoilCorporationatKamareddygudem/DevaruppuIaGrampanchayats' Devaruppula^{MandalJangaon District'}

¶15

Counsel^{for the Petitioner:SRI S' CHALAPATHI RAO} a;;;;;ifor^{the Respondent No'1:} ' s'ir.rron^SMT' ieNeu^{A' DEEPTHI'} couNSEL'cENTRAL GovERNMENT Counsel for^{the Respona"ntG":to 4: SRI B' MAYUR REDDY'S'C' FOR I'O'C'L'} Counsel for^{the ResPondentNo'S:} - itre Court made^{the following:ORDER}

¶16

I'HE I{ON'BLE^{SRI JUSTICEABHINANDKI.,'IAII SHAVILI}

¶17

WRI'T PETITI ON No.40^{17 of2l9}

¶18

OIIDER:

¶19

Counsel for the^{petitionerseekspermissionto withdrawthe writ} petition with a liberty to the^{petitionerto file a writ petitionafresh, if} necessar')'

¶20

I)ermission is accorded^{and the writ petition is accordingly} disrnissed as wilh<irawn^{giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge} the subsequent proceedings^{issued in I'avourof the 5'h respondent. No}

¶21

order as to costs

¶22

Pending miscellaneous^{petitions, if any, shall stantl closed.}

//TRUE COPY/I

SD/.K.ONESIM ASSISTANT RE,GISTRAR +\ -/.

¶27

SECTION O.FFICER

¶28

¶29

'1 . One CC to Sri S. Chalapathi Rao, Advocate IOPUC] 2. One CC io Smt. n. Oeeptni,^{Senior Panel} Qo-unse!1-Cg(ral^{GovernmentIOPUC]} 3. One CC to Sri B. Mayui^{Reddy, S.C.for l.O.C.L. (OPUC)}

¶30

Two CD Copies.

¶31

One Spare CoPy.

MP 4-'

HIGH COURT

DATED:0810912021

ORDER

,1; ; lA7
-)'
o C
,.) 3 q S'tP 2C21

¶37

WP.No.4O17 of 20'19

¶38

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION,AS^WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS.

¶39

*y
;.^

Satyanarayana Reddy Gaddam v. The Government of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satyanarayana Reddy Gaddam v. The Government of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.D. Apsrtc, Hyd.and 2 Ors. Vs K. Nagendrachari and Ano

Kakatiya University Warangal Dist Vs I.T.C.L.Court Warangal Dist and Another

Ponnam Akhila, Vs The State of Telangana

Khaja Showkat Ali, Nalgonda District. Vs Divisional Co.Op.Officer, Nalgonda District and 2 Others

Planning, Cordn and Monitoring Board for Min(Pcmb), Hyd and Anr. Vs Member Secy., Admn and Fee Reg Committee, Hyd and 3 Ot

V.S.Reddy, Nalgonda and 5 Others Vs the Depot Manager, Apsrtc, Nalgonda