The Telangana High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking to quash an Industrial Tribunal Award. The Tribunal had granted two months' wages to the wife of a deceased employee. The court held the Tribunal acted legitimately under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and declined to interfere.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINANDKUMAR SHAVILI
WRIT PETITION NO: 17699 OF2002
Between:
AND
1 The Central Government lndustrialTribunal-cum-Labour Court,Rep. by its Presidino Off icer. [/.J.Road, Hvderabad. 2 The Cha'irman. Nagarjuna GrameenaBank, Khammam District.
..,RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article226 oflhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filedtherewith, the High court may be pleasedto call for the recordsfrom the 1st respondentin lndustrial DisputeL.C l.D.No.143of 2001, dated 26-3-2002 andissue an appropriate writ,order or Direction Pa(icularly one in the nature of writ ofcertiorari and quash the Awardas illegal,unjustice contrary to law andperverse and grantconsequential relief.
WPMP. NO:22219 OF 2002
Petition under Section 151 CPCprayingthatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High courtmaybe pleasedto fix an early date of hearing of the writpetition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. A.K. JAYAPRAKASHRAO
Counsel forthe RespondentNo.1: NONEAPPEARED
Counsel forthe RespondentNo.2: SRI K' SRINIVASA MURTHY
The Court made the following:ORDER
HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KU UAR SHAVILI
$r.P .No.17 99 0F 02
ORD R:
This Writ Petition is file d seeking the follou,irrg refief:
('...r,r call lirr. thc rccorcls tiolt rhc 1., respon,lcnt rn Inclr"tlrrl Disputc I_.(_.1.D.\o. i.13 of 200.1. rlated 16.(ll 20(12 und rssuc an approprirrc \.ur. olclcr or ci rccrr,.rn pllrucrtlrtlll c,nt in rhc n,iturc of \'rrr of (_crrrot irr ancl 11rr.1.l1 11,,, \rr:rl,rl :rr rlltU.tl. r.rn[r:,r. (,,r]tr;1r.\ 1,, l\ .ln(l P(ncrsr' :Lnrl !rant c()nscqucntrli rclici xnd I)a: s such iirrrhcr ortlcr or or,-lers jusr tnd ncccssan, in thc cr-cunrstanccs of thc case.,,
2 Heard learned counsel on either side.
dated 17.12.1990 passed bv thc responclcnt-Bank and ought to havc granted full back \'ages ro the legal heirs ol the deceased c mploye e.
_.-Pending miscellaneouspetitions,if any,shall standclosed.
SDA K. ONESIM ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ //TRUE COPY//
To,
CHR
SECTION OFFICER
1 The Presiding officer, central Government lndustrial rribunal-cum-Labour
-Vourr, M.J.Road, Hyderabad. (with records if anv) 2 Ihe Chairman, Naqartuna Graheena Bank, Khanirham District. ? Pf 9g Ig .si,^( J6yaprakasiLRrblno,o.ii6'iobucr 1 9neCC to Sri K. Srinivasa lVlurthy, Advocate tOpUCl 5 Two CD Copies 6 One Spare Copy
HIGH COURT
DATED:0910912021
ORDER
1 tr9 S i AIa.
( (
't
o
0 B 0[l$?1
t)
<br>:.!s
,:
W.P.No.17699 of 2002
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
F
It, >fri1
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Award of the Tribunal granting two months' wages to the deceased employee's wife.
Whether the Tribunal was justified in exercising its powers under Section 2-A(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Whether the Tribunal ought to have set aside the dismissal order and granted full back wages.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
[Ch. Narsamma, Ch. Srinivasutu, Ch. Venkatesain]
The Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court
The Chairman, Nagarjuna Grameena Bank
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
