Disposed

Smt. Esther Rani v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC16 Sept 2021WP/19494/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition filed by landowners seeking a Mandamus order to direct the District Collector to delete 'ZERO' market value for land in the Dharani Portal. The Court directed the Collector to consider the pending online application without evaluating the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Directed the District Collector to consider the online application filed by the petitioner, put interested parties on notice, and pass necessary orders strictly in accordance with law within a period

Smt. Esther Rani Vs The State of Telangana — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2021)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶2

THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY

¶5

wRtT PET|T|ON NO. 19494 0F 2021

¶6

Between:

¶7

Smt. Esther Rani, W/o. T.Y. Ratnam, Aged about 60^years, Occ House Wife, Rl/o. H. No. 26-1411, Chanikyapuri, Safilguda, Malkajgiri, Medchal Dist Hyderabad-47. Represented by her G.P.A. Holders Petitioner No. 2 and 3

¶8

Sri Kandi Laxma Reddy, S/o. Sri Narayana Reddy, Aged about 64^years, Occ Agriculture, Fl/o. H. No. 9-4-448, Kareem Nagar Dist, Telangana.

¶9

Sii. Rallabandi Venkat Reddy, S/o. R. Meena Reddy, Aged abcjut 66^{years, Occ} Agriculture, Fl/o. H. No. 7-53, Vedira village, Ramadugu Mandal, Kareem Nagar Dist ' Telangana

¶10

..PETIT..NER'

¶11

AND

¶12

1 The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶13

2 The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Stamps and Registration Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶14

J Commissioner and lnspector General, Stamps and Registration,^Telangana. 4 The District Collector, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. 5 The Revenue Divisional Officer, Keesara Division, Medchal^{- lr/alkajgiri. District.} 6 rhe Tahsildar, Joint Sub-Resistrar Kapra Mandal, Medchal Yi,[?8,lor,i?it=.,1rc

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia^{praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court^{may be pleased to} issue a Writ, order or direction, more^particularly one in the nature of^{Writ of} Mandamus directing the Respondents to change the Market value by^deletingthe word ZERO in^"Dharani" Portal in respect of Sy No. 97/E situated^{at Vampuguda} Village, Kapra Mandal, under the limits of GHIVC Kapra,^{tt/edchgal-Malkajgiriand} consequently direct the Respondents to register the sale deed.

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MOHAMMED ABDUL RASHEED

¶17

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1, 4 & 5: GP FOR REVENUE

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2, 3 & 6: GP FOR STAMPS AND^REGISTRATION

¶19

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶20

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK RE.DDY

¶21

WRIT PETITION No.1 9494 of 2O2L

¶22

ORDER:

¶23

. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pieader for Revenue for the respondents. With their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. 2. This writ petition is frled seeking a writ of mand.amus directing the respondents to change the market value by deleting the word "ZERO" in Dharani Portal in respect of the land in Survey No.97lE of Vampuguda Village, Kapra Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.

¶24

The learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioners have already filed an application uide No.LM21O0064295 through Online in Dharani portal to the respondent No.4 - District Collector, ventilating their grievance. But, so far no action has been taken thereon.

¶25

Having regard to the above made submission, without going into the merits or demerits of the case, the Writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent No,4- District Collector to consider the Ontine appli.cation Iiled by the petitioner uide No.LM21OOO642IS, and pass necessary orders thereon, strictly in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a pr:riod of ten weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, duly putting all the interested parties on notice.

¶26

Pending miscelianeous petitions, if any, sha11 s:and closed

¶27

There shall be no order as to costs.

¶28

To,

¶29

SD/.K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANT-REGISTRAR (1r> //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

¶30

12 The 5^Z"idi"'slr District Collector, vr"riah."o^{Medchal-Malkajgiri District'noaJr niitie"o'Advocate[oPUcr} of Telangana^at J Yffi tt; i;'^{dE']"; R;'enue' Hisn court for the stat"} 4. Trlvo Hvderabad. CCs to [OUT]^GP for Stamps^{and Registration,High Court for the Stateof} Telangana^{at HYde} rabad. [OUTI R Two CD^CoPies. o. One SPare^CoPY.

N/P

HIGH COURT

DATED:1610912021

ORDER

WP.No.19494 ot 2021

r € o
1
a
(v
.\o
o
2B sEPt021
?
\ >,, +
,)
,]

¶38

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS

¶39

Smt. Esther Rani v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Esther Rani v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Juluri Surya Kala Vs The State of Telangana and 6 others

K.Veeraswamy and another Vs The State of Telangana and another

Shabeer Khan Vs Sri a.Ramesh

Jangili Sathaiah Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others

Ramayanam Laxminarayana Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Smt.Tulja Rani Tiwari Vs State of Telangana