Common order closing three writ petitions challenging auction notices. The Court held that no further orders were necessary as the auction failed due to lack of takers pursuant to interim directions, leaving remedies open for fresh steps.
Miscellaneous petitions dismissed. No order as to costs. Writ petitions closed for normal proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION Nos. 20867, 29573 and 38539 of 2016
COMMON ORDER: (Per VRS,J)
These writ petitions challenge different auction sale notices. It is represented by the learned standing counsel for the respondentBank that pursuant to the interim direction granted by this Court, the auction was held, but there were no takers. Therefore, no further orders are necessary in these writ petitions, as the auction has failed. Hence, these writ petitions are closed, leaving it open to the petitioners to work out their remedies, as and when fresh steps are taken, in a manner provided by law.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the writ petitions shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
__________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
_____________________ G. SHYAM PRASAD, J
18th November, 2016 cbs
VRS,J & GSP,J WP No. 20867,29573&38539 of 2016
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN √ AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G. SHYAM PRASAD
Writ Petition Nos. 20867, 29573 & 38539 of 2016 (Per VRS,J)
18th November, 2016
cbs
Petitioners
Respondent Bank
V. Ramasubramanian
G. Shyam Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
