12. Thus, to sum up, what emerges is that the petitioner failed to file any Presidential notification or any other reliable document to show that his village Anarpally is a scheduled area village which alone entitles him to the appointment. On the other hand, the petitioner filed some additional material papers such as a copy of District Census Hand Book, Adilabad, and some appointment orders issued to one Madhavi Tirumala and Rathod Anamika as secondary grade teachers, a copy of the forest rights certificates issued to one Rathod Goriya and another Eplavat Sukhlal both of whom are described as residents of Anarpally regarding certain lands in a scheduled area. May be, but from the above documents it cannot be concluded positively that Anarpally is in a scheduled area and it is quite possible that the above certificates or appointments issued treating the above individuals as scheduled tribe candidates. The petitioner is also a scheduled tribe candidate but the qualification required here is that his village should be in a scheduled area and that is not proved by the petitioner. In the above circumstances, it follows that there is no ground to interfere in this matter.
