High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed Criminal Petition No. 9540 of 2012 as infructuous. The legitimacy of cheque-bounce proceedings challenged by special leave petition was not considered on merits due to settlement.
Criminal Petition No. 9540 of 2012 dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
TUESDAY THE TWELVETH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN
PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 9540 OF 2012
Between:
Manda Krishna Kumar … Petitioners/Accused
V/s.
Budithi Venkateswarlu & Anr. … Respondents/complainant
Counsel for Petitioners : Sri P.Shahi Kiran
Counsel for Respondents : Sri Jakkamsetti Ravindra for R-1 Public Prosecutor for R-2
The court made the following: [order follows]
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 9540 OF 2012
O R D E R :
This Criminal Petition is filed to quash proceedings in
CC.No. 512 of 2012 on the file of III-Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad, for alleged offences under section 138 read
with section 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
2. Advocate for petitioner represented that the matter has
become infructuous.
3. Recording the submission of Advocate for petitioner, this
Criminal Petition is dismissed, as infructuous.
4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petition if any, pending in this
criminal petition shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR .
12/08/2014 I s L.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S. RAVI KUMAR
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 9540 OF 2012
Circulation No. 92 Date: 12/08/2014 Court Master : I s L Computer No. 43
1 issue framed by the court
Whether proceedings under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act should be quashed when the matter is found to be infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manda Krishna Kumar
Budithi Venkateswarlu
S. RAVI KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
