Civil Revision Petition No. 910 of 2008 was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying O.P.No.9 of 1999 was already disposed of, leaving nothing for adjudication on merits.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 910 OF 2008
Between:
H.M.P.Subhanji Rao and another
..... PETITIONERS
AND
Revenue Divisional Officer cum Land Acquisition Officer, Anantapur and others
RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioners:
Counsel for the Respondents:
The Court made the following :
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 910 OF 2008
O R D E R :
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that O.P.No.9 of 1999 out of which the present revision petition arose was already disposed of and therefore, nothing survives for adjudication on merits.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
____________ Date: 06.04.2010 G. ROHINI, J
Ivd
H.M.P.Subhanji Rao and another
Revenue Divisional Officer cum Land Acquisition Officer, Anantapur and others
G. Rohini
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
