A single line order closing Contempt Case No. 6 of 2010 as the compliance of a prior order in W.P.No.19067 of 2009 is represented by both parties, requiring no further enquiry.
Contempt Case closed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
CONTEMPT CASE No. 6 OF 2010
Between:
D.Srinivasa Chary
..... PETITIONER
AND
Sri S.S.P.Yadav, I.P.S APSRTC, Rep. by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad and others
....RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondents:
The Court made the following :
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
CONTEMPT CASE No. 6 OF 2010
O R D E R :
It is represented by the learned counsel for both the parties that the order in W.P.M.P.No.24914 of 2009 in W.P.No.19067 of 2009 has been complied with.
Hence, no further enquiry is necessary and the Contempt Case is accordingly closed. No costs.
____________ Date: 01.04.2010 G. ROHINI, J
Ivd
D. Srinivasa Chary
Sri S.S.P. Yadav, I.P.S, APSRTC, Rep. by its Managing Director, Musheerabad, Hyderabad
G. ROHINI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
