In a contempt case, the petitioner did not appear. The court was informed that the impugned order was vacated by a subsequent order. No further enquiry was deemed necessary, and the contempt case was dismissed without costs.
Contempt case dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TEN
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
CONTEMPT CASE No. 357 OF 2010
Between: P.Esmaeel
..... PETITIONER
AND
Mr. P.Gopal Reddy,Chairman & Managing Director, A.P.Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd., Tirupati and others
RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondents:
The Court made the following :
THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI
CONTEMPT CASE No. 357 OF 2010
O R D E R :
None appears for the petitioner.
It is represented by the learned counsel for the respondents that the order in W.P.M.P.No.2434 of 2010 in W.P.No.1821 of 2010, dated 02.02.2010, which was allegedly disobeyed by the respondents, was vacated by a subsequent order dated 01.04.2010.
Hence, no further enquiry is necessary and accordingly, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No costs.
____________ Date: 07.04.2010 G. ROHINI, J
Ivd
P.Esmaeel
Mr. P.Gopal Reddy
G.ROHINI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
