The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed Writ Petition No. 6338 of 2001 as infructuous after the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause of action had become infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO : 6338 of 2001
Between:
Telali Gureddy S/o. Veera Raghava Reddy R/o. Penumantra Village and Mandal, W.G.District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari by calling for the records relating to the proceedings dt.24-2-2001 of the 2nd Respondent and declare the same as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the Respondents 1 and 2 to evaluate the merits of the petitioner afresh and award the petroleum products dealership of Polamuru of West Godavari District.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.B.SOMASEKHAR
Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 : MR.P.V.SANJAY KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Mr. R. Satyanarayana Raju Counsel for the Respondent No.4: None appeared.
The Court made the following :
ORDER:
Sri B. Somasekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in this writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
7.7.2005
CVM
To,
3. 2 CD copies.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable in view of the cause becoming infructuous.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Telali Gureddy S/o. Veera Raghava Reddy
The Senior Divisional Manager Indian Oil Corporation
The Chairman, Dealer Selection Board
Chilapati Suresh
Kalidindi Ranga Raju S/o. Venkata raju
R. Subhash Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
