Pushpendra Singh Gurjar @ Sumit S/O Battu Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:25553]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8539/2026 URN: CRLMB / 15555U / 2026

Pushpendra Singh Gurjar @ Sumit S/o Battu Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Kamalpura, Police Station Bhusavar, Bharatpur At Present Residing As Tenant Near Bharat Mata Chock Harnathpura Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur At Present Residing At Kishan Ka Hotel, Mahala Boraj, Police Station Bagru, Jaipur (West) (Presently Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur)

¶5

----Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. AjaySingh Tanwar
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP
	Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

¶11

Order

¶12

08/07/2026

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed against the order of the learned Trial Court dated 12.05.2026 on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 108/2026 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, District Jaipur City(East) for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 304(2) of BNS.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accusedpetitioner is in custody since long; that the alleged offence(s) is triable by Magistrate; that the recovery against the accused-

[2026:RJ-JP:25553]

[CRLMB-8539/2026]

(2 of 3)

petitioner has already been effected; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

¶19

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the contentions preferred by learned counsel for the accusedpetitioner hereinabove. It is further submitted that there are six criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner.

¶20

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 09.04.2026; that the recovery against the accused-petitioner has already been effected; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accusedpetitioner on bail.

¶21

Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Pushpendra Singh Gurjar @ Sumit S/o Battu Singh is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(3 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:25553]

[CRLMB-8539/2026]

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail.

¶26

In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

¶27

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶28

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶29

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶30

39/AMAN

Pushpendra Singh Gurjar @ Sumit S/O Battu Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pushpendra Singh Gurjar @ Sumit S/O Battu Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharti Singh @ Gograj S/O Late Shri Narayan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Uday Singh S/O Thakur Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Satveer S/O Shri Jagram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganguram S/O Sohan Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Dharm Singh S/O Prem Shankar Vs State of Rajasthan

Dinesh Son of Babulal Vs State of Rajasthan