Allowed

Dharm Singh S/O Prem Shankar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Jul 2026CRLMB/6552/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble High Court of Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur, vide bail application order dated 08.07.2026, allowed the bail application of Dharm Singh. The Court, without expressing opinion on merits, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused on bail despite opposition and criminal antecedent, directing release upon furnishing security.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail upon furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court.

Dharm Singh S/O Prem Shankar Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:25480]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6552/2026 URN: CRLMB / 11794U / 2026

¶4

Dharm Singh S/o Prem Shankar, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Shyomata, Police Station Soorwal, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur).

¶5

---Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Girish Khandelwal
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Sudesh Saini,P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

¶11

Order

¶12

08/07/2026

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed against the order of the learned Trial Court dated 21.04.2026, on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.72/2026 registered at Police Station Soorwaal, District Sawai Madhopur, for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 318(4),319(2),316(2),112(2) 238(a) of BNS & 66D IT Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long; that the alleged offences are triable by magistrate; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

[2026:RJ-JP:25480]

[CRLMB-6552/2026]

(2 of 3)

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accusedpetitioner hereinabove. It is further submitted that one criminal antecedent is registered against the accused-petitioner.

¶19

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and rival contentions advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 12.04.2026; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶20

Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Dharm Singh S/o Prem Shankar, is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

[2026:RJ-JP:25480]

[CRLMB-6552/2026]

(3 of 3)

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶26

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned learned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶27

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶28

16/AMAN

Dharm Singh S/O Prem Shankar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharm Singh S/O Prem Shankar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharti Singh @ Gograj S/O Late Shri Narayan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Uday Singh S/O Thakur Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Satveer S/O Shri Jagram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganguram S/O Sohan Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Dinesh Son of Babulal Vs State of Rajasthan

Pushpendra Singh Gurjar @ Sumit S/O Battu Singh Vs State of Rajasthan