Ganguram S/O Sohan Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

Ganguram S/O Sohan Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Accused-petitioner Ganguram S/o Sohan Lal enlarged on bail under Section 483 BNSS on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each, with conditions of appearance on all hearing dates, monthly presence at the concerned police station, and abstention from fresh offences during the currency of bail.

Issue for consideration

Whether the accused-petitioner, arraigned in FIR No.61/2026 for offences under various sections of the BNS and facing allegations of criminal antecedents, is entitled to be enlarged on bail under Section 483 BNSS after submission of the charge-sheet. +1 more

Court's answer

Taking into account the totality of facts and circumstances - the charge-sheet material on record, custody of the accused-petitioner since 09.04.2026, his status as a senior citizen (recorded in the order as 68 years old, though the cause-title records his age as about 38 years), non-attribution of the fatal injury to him, and the time the trial will take - this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, deemed it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

Ratio / Principle

The instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS was allowed and the accused-petitioner Ganguram S/o Sohan Lal was ordered to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, subject to appearing before that Court (and any transferee Court) on all subsequent dates of hearing.

Key takeaways

As a condition of bail, the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence during the currency of the bail and shall mark his presence once a month at the concerned police station.ratio¶25
Upon any breach of the bail conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor is free to move an application for cancellation of bail against the accused-petitioner before the concerned Court.ratio¶26
The observations made in the order are confined to the decision of the bail application and shall not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail - Section 483 BNSS - S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6512/2026, Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench (Sangeeta Sharma, J.), order dated 08/07/2026 - Accused-petitioner Ganguram S/o Sohan Lal implicated in FIR No.61/2026, P.S. Thanagazi, District Alwar, for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 125(a), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 329(3) BNS, with charge-sheet under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 189(2), 190, 191(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352 BNS - In custody since 09.04.2026 - Prosecution opposed bail citing three criminal antecedents - Court noted the fatal injury to the injured was not attributed to the petitioner, his senior-citizen status, and that the trial would take its own time - Without expressing any opinion on merits, bail granted on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each - Conditions: monthly presence at the concerned police station and no fresh offences; breach open to cancellation application - Observations confined to the bail decision, without impact on trial.

[2026:RJ-JP:25478]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6512/2026 URN: CRLMB / 11714U / 2026

Ganguram S/o Sohan Lal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Todi Luharan, Police Station Thanagazi, District Alwar, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined In Central Jail Alwar).

----Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Anubhav Sharma
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Tapesh Agrawal,P.P.

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

Order

08/07/2026

The instant bail application has been filed against the order of the learned Trial Court dated 16.04.2026, on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.61/2026 registered at Police Station Thanagazi, District Alwar, for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 125(a), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3), 329(3) of BNS, in which charge-sheet has been submitted under Section 109(1), 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 189(2), 190, 191(2), 351(2), 351(3), 352 of BNS.

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long; that the injury sustained by the injured which is dangerous in nature is not attributed to the accused-

[2026:RJ-JP:25478]

[CRLMB-6512/2026]

(2 of 3)

petitioner; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the contentions preferred by learned counsel for the accusedpetitioner hereinabove. It is further submitted that there are three criminal antecedent registered against the accused-petitioner so, he should not be enlarged on bail.

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and material available on record in form of chargesheet; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 09.04.2026; that the accused-petitioner is 68 years old senior citizen; that the fatal injury sustained by the injured is not attributed to accusedpetitioner; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Ganguram S/o Sohan Lal, is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(3 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:25478]

[CRLMB-6512/2026]

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence once in a month in the concerned police station.

In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned learned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

15/AMAN