Dinesh Son of Babulal Vs State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:25491]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6690/2026 URN: CRLMB / 12083U / 2026

Dinesh Son Of Babulal, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Village Ekda, Police Station Choth Ka Barwara, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur).

¶5

---Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P.

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

¶11

Order

¶12

08/07/2026

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed against the order of the learned Trial Court dated 20.04.2026, on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.117/2026 registered at Police Station Choth Ka Barwada District Sawai Madhopur, for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4) of BNS & 66D IT Act, in which chargesheet has been filed under Section 319(2), 318(4), 112(2), 61(2) (a) of BNS, Section 66D IT Act & Section 13 of Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance,1949.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so

[2026:RJ-JP:25491]

[CRLMB-6690/2026]

(2 of 3)

no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accusedpetitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accusedpetitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

¶19

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accusedpetitioner hereinabove. It is further submitted that there is no criminal antecedent registered against the accused-petitioner.

¶20

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and rival contentions advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 16.04.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accusedpetitioner; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶21

Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Dinesh Son Of Babulal, is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail.

[2026:RJ-JP:25491]

[CRLMB-6690/2026]

(3 of 3)

In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

¶27

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶28

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned learned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶29

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶30

20/AMAN

Dinesh Son of Babulal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Son of Babulal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharti Singh @ Gograj S/O Late Shri Narayan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Uday Singh S/O Thakur Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Satveer S/O Shri Jagram Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganguram S/O Sohan Lal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Dharm Singh S/O Prem Shankar Vs State of Rajasthan

Pushpendra Singh Gurjar @ Sumit S/O Battu Singh Vs State of Rajasthan