Satveer S/O Shri Jagram Vs State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:25326]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8038/2026 URN: CRLMB / 14685U / 2026

Vimal S/o Babulal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Nimli Khurd, Police Station Kotwali, District Sawai Madhopur, Raj. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Sawai Madhopur).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9255/2026 URN: CRLMB / 16979U / 2026

¶11

Satveer S/o Shri Jagram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Gram Nimli Khurd Ps Kotwali, Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). (At Present Confined At Distt. Jail Sawai Madhopur)

¶12

----Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through The PP

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Sharma, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Amit Kumar Sharma and Mr. Naman Gurjar Mr. S.S. Hasan, Sr. Adv. assisted by Mr. Ishan Raj Khan Mr. Anas Khan Mr. Aquif Khan Mr. D.N. Sondhi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, Dy. GA Mr. Madan Lal, I.O. Kotwali, Sawai Madhopur

¶17

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

¶18

Order

¶19

07/07/2026

¶20

The instant bail applications have been filed against the orders of the learned Trial Court dated 14.05.2026 & 25.05.2026,

[2026:RJ-JP:25326]

[CRLMB-8038/2026]

(2 of 3)

on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.169/2026 registered at Police Station Kotwali, Sawai Madhopur, District Sawai Madhopur, for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 318(4),319(2),112(2), 61(2) (a) of BNS & 66D IT Act.

¶25

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case; that charge-sheet has already been filed. He also submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody since long; that the alleged offences are triable by magistrate; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioners behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioners may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

¶26

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accusedpetitioners hereinabove but did not dispute the fact that there are no criminal cases registered against the accused-petitioners. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for both the parties; that the charge-sheet has already been filed; and there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioners; that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 11.05.2026 & 18.05.2026; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

[2026:RJ-JP:25326]

[CRLMB-8038/2026]

(3 of 3)

Therefore, the instant bail applications under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners Vimal S/o Babulal & Satveer S/o Shri Jagram, are ordered to be released on bail, provided they furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶31

It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any offence(s) during currency of the bail.

¶32

In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioners for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

¶33

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶34

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned learned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶35

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶36

31-32/AMAN

Satveer S/O Shri Jagram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satveer S/O Shri Jagram v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saddam Khan S/O Fumman Khan Vs the State of Rajasthan

Manish S/O Ramdhan Vs State of Rajasthan

Irfan S/O Sh. Mohmmad Haneef Vs State of Rajasthan

Dharti Singh @ Gograj S/O Late Shri Narayan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Uday Singh S/O Thakur Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Roshan Singh S/O Late Narayan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan