A criminal miscellaneous petition became infructuous due to a compromise between parties, leading the court to dismiss the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:4668]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 595/2017
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Kumar for Mr. Saransh Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Mahala, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
29/01/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that parties have entered into a compromise, thus, this petition has become infructuous.
In view of the above submission, the present criminal misc. petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
40-nirmala
Sitaram
Manbhar Devi
Madhusudhan
State Of Rajasthan
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
