Bail application under the NDPS regime was sought to be withdrawn by counsel with liberty to file afresh after recording the Seizure Officer's testimony. The High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn and directed the trial court to record the Seizure Officer's testimony on a priority basis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 571/2024
Amreek Singh S/o Meva Singh, R/o Tarayan P.s. Pachhiyan, Dist. Patiala (Punjab) (Petitioner Is In Dist. Jail Bundi)
----Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ali Mohd. Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sanjeev Mahala, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
29/01/2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this bail application with liberty to file fresh bail application after recording testimony of the Seizure Officer.
Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
However, trial Court is directed to record the testimony of the Seizure Officer on priority basis.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
ANAND TANWAR /3
Amreek Singh
The State of Rajasthan, Through PP
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
