Quashed

Tarachand Urf Pala Ram Son of Shri Kalu Ram , v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC29 Jan 2024CRLMP/114/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition filed by accused-petitioners to quash the FIR registered against them. Relying on the Supreme Court precedent and finding that a dispute has been resolved through compromise, the Court quashed the FIR and set aside the registration.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.724/2023 registered at Police Station Udhyog Nagar (Sikar), District Sikar is quashed and set aside. Stay application disposed of.

Tarachand Urf Pala Ram Son of Shri Kalu Ram , Vs State of… — Quashing and FIR | Rajasthan HC (2024)

¶1

[2024:RJ-JP:4752]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 114/2024

¶4

Tarachand Urf Pala Ram Son Of Shri Kalu Ram, Resident Of Ward No-38 Parbhu Prasad Ki Gali Radhakishnpura Sikar (Raj.)

¶5

Babulal Son Of Shri Jawahar Mal, Resident Of Ward No.-1 Reta Sikar (Raj.)

¶6

Nemi Chand Gora Son Of Shri Pyare Lal Gora, Resident Of Via Katrathal Kudli Sikar (Raj.)

¶7

Dinesh Son Of Shri Keshar, Resident Ofdhani Ghorana Kudli Sikar (Raj.)

¶8

----Petitioners

¶9

Versus

¶10

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶11

Bhagirath Katariya Son Of Mahaveer Prasad, Aged About 28 Years, Resident Of Ward No.-5 Piprali Road Samrathpura , Tehsil And District Sikar (Raj.)

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K. K. Bhinda For Respondent(s) : Mr. M. K. Sheoran, PP Mr. Manish Sharma

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

¶15

Order

¶16

29/01/2024

¶17

Petitioners No.1 to 3 and complainant are present in person and have been duly identified by their respective counsel.

¶18

By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.724/2023 registered at Police Station Udhyog Nagar (Sikar),

[2024:RJ-JP:4752]

[CRLMP-114/2024]

(2 of 2)

District Sikar for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 504 and 34 of IPC.

¶23

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of the investigation, the petitioners have entered into compromise with the complainant. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition.

¶24

Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the factum of compromise. 5. In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for my perusal; considering that the parties have resolved their dispute and also finding that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors.

¶25

[ AIR 1992 SC 604 ], the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties.

¶26

In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.724/2023 registered at Police Station Udhyog Nagar (Sikar), District Sikar is quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow.

¶27

The stay application also stands disposed of.

¶28

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶29

GAUTAM JAIN /418

Tarachand Urf Pala Ram Son of Shri Kalu Ram , v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tarachand Urf Pala Ram Son of Shri Kalu Ram , v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ilmuddin @ Immu S/O Moinuddin @ Latur Chandiwala, Vs State of Rajasthan

Kamruddin @ Kamlesh Son of Shri Saleem Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Manraj S/O Gulab Chand Vs State of Rajasthan

Rakesh Badwal S/O Madu Ram Badwal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Sitaram and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Amreek Singh S/O Meva Singh Vs the State of Rajasthan