Appeal against rejection of bail under Section 14A(2) SC/ST Act. High Court allowed appeal and granted bail, noting no risk of injury repetition and co-accused bail, setting aside trial court order.
Impugned order set aside; appellant released on bail with personal bond of Rs.50,000 and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2024:RJ-JP:4515]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 59/2024
Kamruddin @ Kamlesh Son Of Shri Saleem Khan, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Khan Satalkhedi, Police Station Suket, Dsitrict Kota (At Present Confined In District Jail Kota)
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka For Respondent(s) : Mr. Babulal Nasuna, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
25/01/2024
[2024:RJ-JP:4515]
[CRLAS-59/2024]
(2 of 3)
[2024:RJ-JP:4515]
[CRLAS-59/2024]
(3 of 3)
injury as also co-accused has been granted benefit of bail by this Court, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I am of the opinion that the appellant deserves to be enlarged on bail, in its aforesaid background.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
CHARU SONI /30
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant deserves bail given that co-accused is already on bail and there is no allegation of repeating injuries.
Whether the High Court should allow the criminal appeal against the rejection of bail application under Section 14A(2).
5 provisions across 3 enactments
Kamruddin @ Kamlesh Son Of Shri Saleem Khan
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
Sanwliya Son Of Ramkisan
ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
